Suppr超能文献

南加州儿科脑死亡判定与记录的差异

Variability in pediatric brain death determination and documentation in southern California.

作者信息

Mathur Mudit, Petersen LuCyndi, Stadtler Maria, Rose Colleen, Ejike J Chiaka, Petersen Floyd, Tinsley Cynthia, Ashwal Stephen

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Hospital, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):988-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1871.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Because the concept of brain death is difficult to define and to apply, we hypothesized that significant variability exists in pediatric brain death determination and documentation.

METHODS

Children (0-18 years of age) for whom death was determined with neurologic criteria between January 2000 and December 2004, in southern California, were included. Medical charts were reviewed for documented performance of 14 specific elements derived from the 1987 brain death guidelines and confirmatory testing.

RESULTS

A total of 51.2% of children (142 of 277 children) referred to OneLegacy became organ donors. Care locations varied, including PICUs (68%), adult ICUs (29%), and other (3%). One patient was <7 days, 6 were 7 days to 2 months, 22 were 2 months to 1 year, and 113 were >1 year of age. The number of brain death examinations performed was 0 (4 patients), 2 (122 patients), 3 (14 patients), or 4 (2 patients). Recommended intervals between examinations were followed for 18% of patients >1 year of age and for no younger patients. A mean of only 5.5 of 14 examination elements were completed by neurologists and pediatric intensivists and 5.8 by neurosurgeons. No apnea testing was recorded in 60% of cases, and inadequate PaCO(2) increase occurred in more than one half. Cerebral blood flow determination was performed as a confirmatory test 74% of the time (83 of 112 cases), compared with 26% (29 of 112 cases) for electroencephalography alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Children suffering brain death are cared for in various locations by a diverse group of specialists. Clinical practice varies greatly from established guidelines, and documentation is incomplete for most patients. Physicians rely on cerebral blood flow measurements more than electroencephalography for confirmatory testing. Codifying clinical and testing criteria into a checklist could lend uniformity and enhance the quality and rigor of this crucial determination.

摘要

目的

由于脑死亡的概念难以界定和应用,我们推测小儿脑死亡判定及记录存在显著差异。

方法

纳入2000年1月至2004年12月间在南加州依据神经学标准判定死亡的0至18岁儿童。回顾病历,查看是否记录了源自1987年脑死亡指南的14项特定要素的执行情况及确认性检查。

结果

转诊至OneLegacy的儿童中,共有51.2%(277名儿童中的142名)成为器官捐献者。护理地点各异,包括儿科重症监护病房(68%)、成人重症监护病房(29%)及其他(3%)。1名患者年龄小于7天,6名患者年龄为7天至2个月,22名患者年龄为2个月至1岁,113名患者年龄大于1岁。进行脑死亡检查的次数为0次(4名患者)、2次(122名患者)、3次(14名患者)或4次(2名患者)。年龄大于1岁的患者中,仅18%遵循了推荐的检查间隔时间,年龄较小的患者则无人遵循。神经科医生和儿科重症监护医生平均仅完成了14项检查要素中的5.5项,神经外科医生完成了5.8项。60%的病例未记录呼吸暂停测试,超过一半的病例动脉血二氧化碳分压升高不足。74%的时间(112例中的83例)进行了脑血流测定作为确认性检查,仅脑电图检查的比例为26%(112例中的29例)。

结论

脑死亡患儿由不同专业的医生在不同地点进行护理。临床实践与既定指南差异很大,大多数患者的记录不完整。在确认性检查中,医生更多地依赖脑血流测量而非脑电图检查。将临床和检查标准编纂成清单可使其统一,并提高这一关键判定的质量和严谨性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验