Nicholson James M, Parry Samuel, Caughey Aaron B, Rosen Sarah, Keen Allison, Macones George A
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):511.e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.037.
The purpose of this study was to compare birth outcomes that result from the active management of risk in pregnancy at term (AMOR-IPAT) to those outcomes that result from standard management.
This was a randomized clinical trial with 270 women of mixed parity. AMOR-IPAT used preventive labor induction to ensure delivery before the end of an estimated optimal time of delivery. Rates of 4 adverse obstetric events and 2 composite measures were used to evaluate birth outcomes.
The AMOR-IPAT-exposed group had a similar cesarean delivery rate (10.3% vs 14.9%; P = .25), but a lower neonatal intensive care unit admission rate (1.5% vs 6.7%; P = .03), a higher uncomplicated vaginal birth rate (73.5% vs 62.8%; P = .046), and a lower mean Adverse Outcome Index score (1.4 vs 8.6; P = .03).
AMOR-IPAT exposure improved the pattern of birth outcomes. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to explore further the impact of AMOR-IPAT on birth outcomes and to determine the best methods of preventive labor induction.
本研究旨在比较足月妊娠风险主动管理(AMOR-IPAT)所产生的分娩结局与标准管理所产生的分娩结局。
这是一项针对270名不同产次女性的随机临床试验。AMOR-IPAT采用预防性引产以确保在估计的最佳分娩时间结束前分娩。使用4种不良产科事件发生率和2种综合指标来评估分娩结局。
接受AMOR-IPAT的组剖宫产率相似(10.3%对14.9%;P = 0.25),但新生儿重症监护病房入住率较低(1.5%对6.7%;P = 0.03),无并发症阴道分娩率较高(73.5%对62.8%;P = 0.046),平均不良结局指数得分较低(1.4对8.6;P = 0.03)。
接受AMOR-IPAT改善了分娩结局模式。需要更大规模的随机临床试验来进一步探索AMOR-IPAT对分娩结局的影响,并确定预防性引产的最佳方法。