一项缓解和预防颈/肩疼痛的随机对照干预试验。

A randomized controlled intervention trial to relieve and prevent neck/shoulder pain.

作者信息

Andersen Lars L, Jørgensen Marie B, Blangsted Anne Katrine, Pedersen Mogens T, Hansen Ernst A, Sjøgaard Gisela

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, DENMARK.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jun;40(6):983-90. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181676640.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of three different workplace interventions on long-term compliance, muscle strength gains, and neck/shoulder pain in office workers.

METHODS

A 1-yr randomized controlled intervention trial was done with three groups: specific resistance training (SRT, n = 180), all-round physical exercise (APE, n = 187), and reference intervention (REF, n = 182) with general health counseling. Physical tests were performed and questionnaires answered at pre-, mid-, and postintervention. The main outcome measures were compliance, changes in maximal muscle strength, and changes in intensity of neck/shoulder pain (scale 0-9) in those with and without pain at baseline.

RESULTS

Regular participation was achieved by 54%, 31%, and 16% of those of the participants who answered the questionnaire in SRT (78%), APE (81%), and REF (80%), respectively, during the first half of the intervention period, and decreased to 35%, 28% and 9%, respectively, during the second half. Shoulder elevation strength increased 9-11% in SRT and APE (P < 0.0001). Participants with neck pain at baseline decreased the intensity of neck pain through SRT, from 5.0 +/- 0.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.0001), and through APE, from 5.0 +/- 0.2 to 3.6 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.001), whereas REF caused no change. For participants without shoulder pain at baseline, there was a significantly greater increase in pain over the 1-yr period in REF compared with SRT and APE (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compliance was highest in SRT but generally decreased over time. SRT and APE caused increased shoulder elevation strength, were more effective than REF to decrease neck pain among those with symptoms at baseline, and prevent development of shoulder pain in those without symptoms at baseline.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是调查三种不同的工作场所干预措施对办公室职员长期依从性、肌肉力量增长以及颈部/肩部疼痛的影响。

方法

进行了一项为期1年的随机对照干预试验,分为三组:特定阻力训练(SRT,n = 180)、全面体育锻炼(APE,n = 187)和接受一般健康咨询的对照干预(REF,n = 182)。在干预前、中、后进行体能测试并回答问卷。主要结局指标是依从性、最大肌肉力量的变化以及基线时有疼痛和无疼痛者颈部/肩部疼痛强度(0 - 9级)的变化。

结果

在干预期的前半段,分别有54%、31%和16%回答问卷的SRT组(78%)、APE组(81%)和REF组(80%)的参与者实现了定期参与,而在后半段分别降至35%、28%和9%。SRT组和APE组的肩部抬高力量增加了9% - 11%(P < 0.0001)。基线时有颈部疼痛的参与者通过SRT使颈部疼痛强度从5.0±0.2降至3.4±0.2(P < 0.0001),通过APE从5.0±0.2降至3.6±0.2(P < 0.001),而REF组无变化。对于基线时无肩部疼痛的参与者,与SRT组和APE组相比,REF组在1年期间疼痛的增加显著更大(P < 0.01)。

结论

SRT组的依从性最高,但总体上随时间下降。SRT和APE可使肩部抬高力量增加,在基线时有症状者中比REF更有效地减轻颈部疼痛,并预防基线时无症状者肩部疼痛的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索