气功与运动疗法治疗长期颈痛患者:一项前瞻性随机试验
Qigong and exercise therapy in patients with long-term neck pain: a prospective randomized trial.
作者信息
Lansinger Birgitta, Larsson Elisabeth, Persson Liselott C, Carlsson Jane Y
机构信息
Göteborg University, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology/Physiotherapy, Göteborg, Sweden.
出版信息
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):2415-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573b4b.
STUDY DESIGN
A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial: 1-year follow-up.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness of qigong and exercise therapy in subjects with long-term nonspecific neck pain.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
The evidence for the benefit of treatment programs focusing on persons with long-term, nonspecific neck pain is conflicting. Several studies have shown support for exercise therapy, but the efficacy of qigong has not been scientifically evaluated.
METHODS
A total of 122 patients were randomly assigned to receive either qigong (n = 60) or exercise therapy (n = 62). Most of them were women (70%), and the mean age was 44 years. A maximum of 12 treatments were given over a period of 3 months. Neck pain frequency and intensity, neck disability (NDI), grip strength, and cervical range of motion were recorded before and immediately after, at 6 months, and at 12 months after the treatment period. Changes in outcome variables were analyzed and dichotomized as improved or unchanged/deteriorated.
RESULTS
Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar among groups at baseline. No differences were found between the 2 interventions: qigong and exercise therapy. Both groups significantly improved immediately after treatment and this was maintained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups in 5 of 8 outcome variables: average neck pain in the most recent week, current neck pain (with exception for immediately after treatment period), neck pain diary, NDI, and cervical range of motion in rotation.
CONCLUSION
These results indicate that treatments including supervised qigong or exercise therapy resulting in reduced pain and disability can be recommended for persons with long-term nonspecific neck pain.
研究设计
一项随机对照多中心试验,随访1年。
目的
比较气功与运动疗法对长期非特异性颈部疼痛患者的疗效。
背景资料总结
针对长期非特异性颈部疼痛患者的治疗方案的益处,相关证据存在矛盾。多项研究支持运动疗法,但气功的疗效尚未得到科学评估。
方法
总共122例患者被随机分配接受气功治疗(n = 60)或运动疗法(n = 62)。其中大多数为女性(70%),平均年龄44岁。在3个月内最多进行12次治疗。在治疗期之前、治疗期结束后即刻、6个月时以及12个月时记录颈部疼痛的频率和强度、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、握力以及颈椎活动范围。对结果变量的变化进行分析,并分为改善或未改善/恶化。
结果
各治疗组在基线时的临床和人口统计学特征相似。气功和运动疗法这两种干预措施之间未发现差异。两组在治疗后即刻均显著改善,并且在8项结果变量中的5项在6个月和12个月随访时保持改善:最近一周的平均颈部疼痛、当前颈部疼痛(治疗期结束后即刻除外)、颈部疼痛日记、NDI以及颈椎旋转活动范围。
结论
这些结果表明,对于长期非特异性颈部疼痛患者,可推荐采用包括有监督的气功或运动疗法在内的治疗方法,这些方法可减轻疼痛和功能障碍。