Suppr超能文献

利用受累同胞对数据进行连锁与关联的联合建模。

Joint modeling of linkage and association using affected sib-pair data.

作者信息

Chen Ming-Huei, Cui Jing, Guo Chao-Yu, Cupples L Adrienne, Van Eerdewegh Paul, Dupuis Josée, Yang Qiong

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, 111 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue 341G, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

BMC Proc. 2007;1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s38. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in developing strategies for identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that explain a linkage signal by joint modeling of linkage and association. We compare several existing methods and propose a new method called the homozygote sharing transmission-disequilibrium test (HSTDT) to detect linkage and association or to identify SNPs explaining the linkage signal on chromosome 6 for rheumatoid arthritis using 100 replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) 15 simulated affected sib-pair data. Existing methods considered included the family-based tests of association implemented in FBAT, a transmission-disequilibrium test, a conditional logistic regression approach, a likelihood-based approach implemented in LAMP, and the homozygote sharing test (HST). We compared the type I error rates and power for tests classified into three categories according to their null hypotheses: 1) no association in the presence of linkage (i.e., a SNP explains none of the linkage evidence), 2) no linkage adjusting for the association (i.e., a SNP explains all linkage evidence), and 3) no linkage and no association. For testing association in the presence of linkage, we found similar power among all tests except for the homozygote sharing test that had lower power. When testing linkage adjusting for association, similar power was observed between LAMP and HST, but lower power for the conditional logistic regression method. When testing linkage or association, the conditional logistic regression method was more powerful than FBAT.

摘要

通过对连锁和关联进行联合建模来识别解释连锁信号的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的策略开发,已引起越来越多的关注。我们比较了几种现有方法,并提出了一种名为纯合子共享传递不平衡检验(HSTDT)的新方法,使用遗传分析研讨会(GAW)15模拟的患病同胞对数据的100次重复,来检测类风湿关节炎6号染色体上的连锁和关联,或识别解释连锁信号的SNP。所考虑的现有方法包括在FBAT中实施的基于家系的关联检验、传递不平衡检验、条件逻辑回归方法、在LAMP中实施的基于似然的方法以及纯合子共享检验(HST)。我们根据其零假设将检验分为三类,比较了它们的I型错误率和检验效能:1)在存在连锁的情况下无关联(即一个SNP不能解释任何连锁证据),2)在调整关联后无连锁(即一个SNP解释所有连锁证据),以及3)无连锁且无关联。对于在存在连锁的情况下检验关联,我们发现除了纯合子共享检验效能较低外,所有检验的效能相似。在调整关联后检验连锁时,LAMP和HST的效能相似,但条件逻辑回归方法的效能较低。在检验连锁或关联时,条件逻辑回归方法比FBAT更有效。

相似文献

1
Joint modeling of linkage and association using affected sib-pair data.
BMC Proc. 2007;1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s38. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
4
Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;29(3):225-33. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20091.
5
Comparison of GIST and LAMP on the GAW15 simulated data.
BMC Proc. 2007;1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s41. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
6
Using linkage and association to identify and model genetic effects: summary of GAW15 Group 4.
Genet Epidemiol. 2007;31 Suppl 1:S34-42. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20278.
7
Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Jun;76(6):934-49. doi: 10.1086/430277. Epub 2005 Apr 5.
8
Identification of polymorphisms explaining a linkage signal: application to the GAW14 simulated data.
BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S88.
9
Linkage and association analysis of GAW15 simulated data: fine-mapping of chromosome 6 region.
BMC Proc. 2007;1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-1-s1-s23. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies.
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 1;12(7):465-74. doi: 10.1038/nrg2989.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of polymorphisms explaining a linkage signal: application to the GAW14 simulated data.
BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S88.
2
Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;29(3):225-33. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20091.
3
Recent developments in genomewide association scans: a workshop summary and review.
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;77(3):337-45. doi: 10.1086/432962. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
4
Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Jun;76(6):934-49. doi: 10.1086/430277. Epub 2005 Apr 5.
5
Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 15;21(2):263-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. Epub 2004 Aug 5.
6
Exploring positional candidate genes: linkage conditional on measured genotype.
Behav Genet. 2004 Mar;34(2):173-7. doi: 10.1023/B:BEGE.0000013731.03827.69.
7
Homozygosity and linkage disequilibrium.
Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1707-19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.4.1707.
8
Merlin--rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees.
Nat Genet. 2002 Jan;30(1):97-101. doi: 10.1038/ng786. Epub 2001 Dec 3.
9
Family-based tests of association in the presence of linkage.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Dec;67(6):1515-25. doi: 10.1086/316895. Epub 2000 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验