Suppr超能文献

改善初级保健中的预防工作:评估外展促进的可持续性。

Improving prevention in primary care: Evaluating the sustainability of outreach facilitation.

作者信息

Hogg William, Lemelin Jacques, Moroz Isabella, Soto Enrique, Russell Grant

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2008 May;54(5):712-20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent to which advances in preventive care delivery, achieved in primary care practices through outreach facilitation, could be sustained over time after purposefully redirecting the focus of practice physicians and staff away from prevention and toward a new content area in need of improvement-chronic illness management.

DESIGN

Before-and-after study.

SETTING

Primary care networks and family health networks in Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

A volunteer sample of 30 primary care practices recruited from 99 eligible sites.

INTERVENTION

Outreach visits directed at modifying physician behaviour were delivered by trained nurse facilitators using practice-tailored systems strategies. For the first 12 months, the intervention focused on improving delivery of preventive care, after which facilitation of chronic illness management was introduced for another 3 to 9 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in practices' performance rates for selected preventive maneuvers (according to recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) between baseline and follow-up, conducted 3 to 9 months after the end of the prevention intervention, measured from chart reviews for those maneuvers likely to be recorded and from telephoneinterviews with patients for lifestyle counseling.

RESULTS

Four of the 30 practices dropped out of the study. In the remaining practices, at the postintervention follow-up, there was an increase in the delivery of the appropriate grade A (19.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4% to 28.3%) and B (9.3%, 95% CI 5.4% to 13.2%) maneuvers, accompanied by a reduction in inappropriate grade D maneuvers (-15.9%, 95% CI -22.1% to -9.6%), for an absolute improvement of 12% (P < .0001) in the overall preventive care performance, as determined by a chart audit. We found no changes in the provision of lifestyle counseling maneuvers measured from telephone interviews with patients (1.3%, 95% CI 1.0% to 3.7%).

CONCLUSION

The tailored, multifaceted intervention delivered by nurse facilitators was effective in producing significant improvements in preventive care performance that extended beyond the prevention intervention period.

摘要

目的

评估通过外展促进在初级保健实践中实现的预防保健服务进展,在有目的地将执业医师和工作人员的重点从预防转向需要改进的新内容领域——慢性病管理后,能否随时间持续保持。

设计

前后对照研究。

地点

安大略省的初级保健网络和家庭健康网络。

参与者

从99个符合条件的地点招募的30个初级保健实践的志愿者样本。

干预措施

由经过培训的护士促进者采用针对实践的系统策略进行旨在改变医生行为的外展访问。在最初的12个月里,干预重点是改善预防保健服务,之后引入慢性病管理促进措施,为期3至9个月。

主要观察指标

在预防干预结束后3至9个月进行的基线和随访之间,选定预防措施(根据加拿大预防保健工作组的建议)的实践执行率变化,对于可能记录的措施通过病历审查测量,对于生活方式咨询通过与患者的电话访谈测量。

结果

30个实践中有4个退出了研究。在其余的实践中,干预后随访时,适当的A级(19.3%,95%置信区间[CI]10.4%至28.3%)和B级(9.3%,95%CI 5.4%至13.2%)措施的执行有所增加,同时不适当的D级措施有所减少(-15.9%,95%CI -22.1%至-9.6%),根据病历审核确定,总体预防保健表现绝对改善了12%(P <.0001)。我们发现,通过与患者的电话访谈测量的生活方式咨询措施的提供没有变化(1.3%,95%CI 1.0%至3.7%)。

结论

由护士促进者提供的量身定制的多方面干预措施有效地显著改善了预防保健表现,且这种改善超出了预防干预期。

相似文献

2
Improving prevention in primary care: evaluating the effectiveness of outreach facilitation.
Fam Pract. 2008 Feb;25(1):40-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm070. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
6
Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial.
BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38009.706319.47. Epub 2004 Feb 6.
7
Practice-tailored facilitation to improve pediatric preventive care delivery: a randomized trial.
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1664-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1578. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Improving preventive service delivery through office systems.
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E41. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e41.

引用本文的文献

2
Advancing multimorbidity management in primary care: a narrative review.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Jul 1;23:e36. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000238.
5
Research nurses as practice facilitators to disseminate an asthma shared decision making intervention.
BMC Nurs. 2020 May 18;19:40. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00414-0. eCollection 2020.
6
Application of Disease Etiology and Natural History to Prevention in Primary Health Care: A Discourse.
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(6):501-513. doi: 10.1159/000508718. Epub 2020 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 yr after release of national recommendations for screening.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1727-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01217.x. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
2
3
Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.
JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1788-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: practices and opinions of primary care physicians.
Prev Med. 2004 Aug;39(2):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.037.
8
A population-based estimate of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30623.x.
9
Perspectives on colorectal cancer screening: a focus group study.
Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):51-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00252.x.
10
Sustainability of a practice-individualized preventive service delivery intervention.
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Nov;25(4):296-300. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00219-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验