Hogg William, Lemelin Jacques, Moroz Isabella, Soto Enrique, Russell Grant
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON.
Can Fam Physician. 2008 May;54(5):712-20.
To assess the extent to which advances in preventive care delivery, achieved in primary care practices through outreach facilitation, could be sustained over time after purposefully redirecting the focus of practice physicians and staff away from prevention and toward a new content area in need of improvement-chronic illness management.
Before-and-after study.
Primary care networks and family health networks in Ontario.
A volunteer sample of 30 primary care practices recruited from 99 eligible sites.
Outreach visits directed at modifying physician behaviour were delivered by trained nurse facilitators using practice-tailored systems strategies. For the first 12 months, the intervention focused on improving delivery of preventive care, after which facilitation of chronic illness management was introduced for another 3 to 9 months.
Changes in practices' performance rates for selected preventive maneuvers (according to recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) between baseline and follow-up, conducted 3 to 9 months after the end of the prevention intervention, measured from chart reviews for those maneuvers likely to be recorded and from telephoneinterviews with patients for lifestyle counseling.
Four of the 30 practices dropped out of the study. In the remaining practices, at the postintervention follow-up, there was an increase in the delivery of the appropriate grade A (19.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4% to 28.3%) and B (9.3%, 95% CI 5.4% to 13.2%) maneuvers, accompanied by a reduction in inappropriate grade D maneuvers (-15.9%, 95% CI -22.1% to -9.6%), for an absolute improvement of 12% (P < .0001) in the overall preventive care performance, as determined by a chart audit. We found no changes in the provision of lifestyle counseling maneuvers measured from telephone interviews with patients (1.3%, 95% CI 1.0% to 3.7%).
The tailored, multifaceted intervention delivered by nurse facilitators was effective in producing significant improvements in preventive care performance that extended beyond the prevention intervention period.
评估通过外展促进在初级保健实践中实现的预防保健服务进展,在有目的地将执业医师和工作人员的重点从预防转向需要改进的新内容领域——慢性病管理后,能否随时间持续保持。
前后对照研究。
安大略省的初级保健网络和家庭健康网络。
从99个符合条件的地点招募的30个初级保健实践的志愿者样本。
由经过培训的护士促进者采用针对实践的系统策略进行旨在改变医生行为的外展访问。在最初的12个月里,干预重点是改善预防保健服务,之后引入慢性病管理促进措施,为期3至9个月。
在预防干预结束后3至9个月进行的基线和随访之间,选定预防措施(根据加拿大预防保健工作组的建议)的实践执行率变化,对于可能记录的措施通过病历审查测量,对于生活方式咨询通过与患者的电话访谈测量。
30个实践中有4个退出了研究。在其余的实践中,干预后随访时,适当的A级(19.3%,95%置信区间[CI]10.4%至28.3%)和B级(9.3%,95%CI 5.4%至13.2%)措施的执行有所增加,同时不适当的D级措施有所减少(-15.9%,95%CI -22.1%至-9.6%),根据病历审核确定,总体预防保健表现绝对改善了12%(P <.0001)。我们发现,通过与患者的电话访谈测量的生活方式咨询措施的提供没有变化(1.3%,95%CI 1.0%至3.7%)。
由护士促进者提供的量身定制的多方面干预措施有效地显著改善了预防保健表现,且这种改善超出了预防干预期。