Suppr超能文献

针对妇产科来源厌氧菌的头孢替坦药敏试验:五种不同方法的比较

Cefotetan susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria from obstetrical and gynecologic sources: comparison of five different methods.

作者信息

Maccato M, Riddle G, Faro S

机构信息

Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030,USA.

出版信息

Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1993;1(1):23-6. doi: 10.1155/S1064744993000067.

Abstract

Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetan against 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobic susceptibility testing was as acceptable as the reference agar dilution method. The five methods were: 1) broth disk elution, 2) microbroth technique, 3) a commercially available microbroth technique, 4) a commercially available spiral gradient technique, and 5) reference agar dilution. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) calculated from the spiral gradient technique were equal to or within one doubling dilution of the reference system in 99.5% of cases, while the percentage for the commercially available microbroth system was 96.8%, very similar to the microbroth technique used in our laboratory that yielded a percentage of 96.3. The disk elution method correlated to the reference agar dilution method in 95.3% cases. While the overall agreement between these techniques is good, especially for the spiral gradient system, clustering of certain organisms near the breakpoint of the antibiotic tested results in variability in the labeling of these organisms as susceptible or resistant. This problem appears to be particularly significant for the disk elution method. Therefore, further refinements in these methods of suscleptibility testing are needed in order to provide a more clinically useful assessment of the susceptibility or resistance of certain bacterial isolates.

摘要

采用五种不同的抗生素敏感性检测方法,对从妇产科感染患者中分离出的200株厌氧菌进行头孢替坦有效性检测。本研究的目的是确定一种更经济、快速的厌氧菌敏感性检测方法是否与参考琼脂稀释法一样可接受。这五种方法分别是:1)肉汤纸片洗脱法;2)微量肉汤技术;3)一种市售微量肉汤技术;4)一种市售螺旋梯度技术;5)参考琼脂稀释法。在99.5%的情况下,通过螺旋梯度技术计算出的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与参考系统的最低抑菌浓度相等或在其一个稀释倍数范围内,而市售微量肉汤系统的这一比例为96.8%,与我们实验室使用的微量肉汤技术非常相似,该技术的比例为96.3%。纸片洗脱法与参考琼脂稀释法在95.3%的情况下具有相关性。虽然这些技术之间的总体一致性良好,尤其是螺旋梯度系统,但在测试抗生素的断点附近,某些微生物的聚集导致这些微生物被标记为敏感或耐药时存在变异性。这个问题在纸片洗脱法中似乎尤为显著。因此,需要对这些敏感性检测方法进行进一步改进,以便对某些细菌分离株的敏感性或耐药性提供更具临床实用性的评估。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Perspectives on the bacteriology of postoperative obstetric-gynecologic infections.妇产科术后感染的细菌学研究视角
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):694-700. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44529-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验