• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交叉分类效应中的竞争与合作态度:检验类别优势与等价模型

Competitive versus cooperative attitudes in crossed categorization effects: testing the category dominance and equivalence models.

作者信息

Singh Ramadhar, Poh Woon Ying, Chang Anthony P M

机构信息

Department of Psychology,National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;148(1):5-20. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.1.5-21.

DOI:10.3200/SOCP.148.1.5-21
PMID:18476480
Abstract

Participants' (N = 256) competitive or cooperative attitudes toward national groups were activated by their reading 1 of 2 selected newspaper articles. Participants then judged the competence and attractiveness of a stranger who was categorized, separately for race and nationality, as belonging to an out-group or in-group. As predicted, the activated competitive attitude produced responses prescribed by the model of category dominance by nationality. In the condition of cooperative attitudes, however, competence responses were consistent with the model of equivalence (i.e., no effect of category) and attraction responses were consistent with the model of category dominance by race. The authors discuss reasons for the discrepant models in the condition of cooperative attitudes and the implications of these findings.

摘要

参与者(N = 256)对不同国家群体的竞争或合作态度通过阅读两篇选定报纸文章中的一篇来激发。然后,参与者对一个陌生人的能力和吸引力进行评判,该陌生人根据种族和国籍被分别归类为外群体或内群体。正如预测的那样,被激活的竞争态度产生了符合国籍类别主导模型的反应。然而,在合作态度的情况下,能力反应符合等价模型(即类别无影响),而吸引力反应符合种族类别主导模型。作者讨论了合作态度情况下模型差异的原因以及这些发现的意义。

相似文献

1
Competitive versus cooperative attitudes in crossed categorization effects: testing the category dominance and equivalence models.交叉分类效应中的竞争与合作态度:检验类别优势与等价模型
J Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;148(1):5-20. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.148.1.5-21.
2
I feel like I know you: sharing negative attitudes of others promotes feelings of familiarity.我感觉我了解你:分享他人的负面态度会增进熟悉感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):481-91. doi: 10.1177/0146167211398364. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
3
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
4
Understanding responses to political conflict: interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas.理解对政治冲突的反应:认知闭合需求与显著冲突图式的交互作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;87(6):750-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.750.
5
Producing positive interaction among Down syndrome and nonhandicapped teenagers through cooperative goal structuring.通过合作目标构建,在唐氏综合征青少年和非残疾青少年之间产生积极互动。
Am J Ment Defic. 1980 Nov;85(3):268-73.
6
Differential effects of reciprocity and attitude similarity across long- versus short-term mating contexts.长期与短期交配情境下互惠与态度相似性的差异效应。
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Aug;146(4):423-39. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.4.423-439.
7
When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness.物以类聚,何时并非如此:地位构成、社会主导倾向与组织吸引力。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):396-409. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.396.
8
Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes.人际厌恶、意识形态取向和去人性化作为群体间态度的预测因素。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):691-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.
9
Development of cooperative and competitive play responses in developmentally disabled children.发育障碍儿童合作与竞争游戏反应的发展
Am J Ment Defic. 1975 Nov;80(3):245-55.
10
The socialization of dominance: peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes.支配的社会化:同伴群体情境对恐同态度和支配态度的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1040-50. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1040.

引用本文的文献

1
Nationality dominates gender in decision-making in the Dictator and Prisoner's Dilemma Games.国籍在独裁者和囚徒困境游戏的决策中主导性别。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0244568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244568. eCollection 2021.