Bompas Aline, Sterling Thomas, Rafal Robert D, Sumner Petroc
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):412-21. doi: 10.1152/jn.90312.2008. Epub 2008 May 14.
Monocular viewing conditions show an asymmetry between stimuli presented in the temporal and nasal visual fields in their efficiency for automatically triggering eye saccades and grasping attention. For instance, observers free to make a saccade to one of two stimuli presented together orient preferentially to the temporal stimulus. Such naso-temporal asymmetry (NTA) has been assumed to reflect the asymmetry in the retinotectal pathway to the superior colliculus. We tested this hypothesis using S cone stimuli, which are invisible to the magnocellular and retinotectal pathways. The observed NTA in choice saccades to bilateral stimuli was no less present for S cone stimuli than for luminance stimuli. Additionally, the amplitude of the NTA can be enhanced when S cone signals are added to luminance signals. These results suggest that behavioral NTA in humans is not diagnostic of retinotectal mediation. Furthermore, we found no asymmetries in latency, suggesting that the NTA in saccade choice does not originate simply from a bottom-up asymmetry in any low level visual pathways.
单眼视觉条件下,颞侧和鼻侧视野中呈现的刺激在自动触发眼球扫视和吸引注意力的效率上存在不对称性。例如,观察者可自由对同时呈现的两个刺激之一进行扫视时,会优先朝向颞侧刺激。这种鼻颞侧不对称性(NTA)被认为反映了到上丘的视网膜顶盖通路中的不对称性。我们使用S视锥细胞刺激对这一假设进行了测试,S视锥细胞刺激对于大细胞和视网膜顶盖通路是不可见的。在对双侧刺激的选择扫视中观察到的NTA,对于S视锥细胞刺激而言并不比对亮度刺激少。此外,当S视锥细胞信号添加到亮度信号中时,NTA的幅度可以增强。这些结果表明,人类行为中的NTA并不能诊断视网膜顶盖介导。此外,我们在潜伏期未发现不对称性,这表明扫视选择中的NTA并非仅仅源于任何低水平视觉通路中的自下而上的不对称性。