School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct 1;23(7):1035-48. doi: 10.1080/02643290600588350.
Inhibition of return (IOR)-the automatic bias against returning attention or gaze to recently visited locations-is thought to have both collicular and cortical components and has been associated with the oculomotor system. Recently, distinct IOR mechanisms have been revealed that may have collicular and cortical origins: While standard luminance stimuli cause IOR in both manual and saccadic eye movement responses, "S cone" stimuli, which are invisible to the direct collicular pathway, caused manual IOR but not saccadic IOR. However, it has not been shown that the separate mechanisms are both inhibition of return, rather than facilitation due to attentional momentum or a visual motion transient. Here, we examined this question using four target and cue locations instead of two. Inhibition at the cued location predicts that responses for all noncued locations should be similar, whereas facilitation at the location opposite the cue predicts that the perpendicular locations would be more similar to the cued location than to the opposite location. Our results conform to the former prediction for both saccadic IOR and S cone generated IOR, demonstrating that both mechanisms of IOR are indeed inhibitory.
返回抑制(IOR)——对最近访问过的位置自动产生的注意或注视偏向——被认为具有丘脑中的和皮质中的成分,并且与眼球运动系统有关。最近,已经揭示了具有丘脑中的和皮质中的起源的不同的 IOR 机制:虽然标准亮度刺激会引起手动和扫视眼动反应中的 IOR,但“S 锥体”刺激,即直接丘脑中的通路看不见的刺激,会引起手动 IOR,但不会引起扫视眼动的 IOR。然而,还没有表明这些分离的机制都是返回抑制,而不是由于注意动量或视觉运动瞬变而产生的促进。在这里,我们使用四个目标和提示位置而不是两个位置来检查这个问题。在提示位置的抑制预测所有非提示位置的反应应该是相似的,而在与提示位置相对的位置的促进预测,垂直位置与提示位置比与相反位置更相似。我们的结果与扫视眼动的 IOR 和 S 锥体产生的 IOR 都符合前一种预测,表明 IOR 的这两种机制确实都是抑制性的。