Hamilton Jada G, Lobel Marci
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, NY, USA.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jun;29(2):97-104. doi: 10.1080/01674820701690624.
The present study investigated coping in early, mid-, and late pregnancy in 321 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse women of varying medical risk. The goal was to determine how women cope with stress across pregnancy and to explore the association of coping with maternal characteristics, stress perceptions, disposition, and social support. Factor analysis of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory revealed three distinct types of coping: Planning-Preparation, Avoidance, and Spiritual-Positive Coping. Spiritual coping was used most frequently during pregnancy; avoidant coping was used least often. As hypothesized, use of spiritual coping and avoidance differed across pregnancy. Planning was used more consistently across time. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictors of planning were high optimism and pregnancy-specific distress. Avoidance was most strongly predicted by high state anxiety and pregnancy-specific distress. Greater religiosity and optimism were the strongest predictors of spiritual coping. These results add to a body of evidence that women use distinctive and varied strategies to manage stress prenatally. They also suggest that coping is responsive to changing demands across pregnancy and reflective of women's characteristics, perceptions, and social situations.
本研究调查了321名不同种族和社会经济背景、具有不同医疗风险的女性在孕早期、中期和晚期的应对方式。目的是确定女性在整个孕期如何应对压力,并探讨应对方式与母亲特征、压力认知、性格和社会支持之间的关联。对修订后的产前应对量表进行因素分析,发现了三种不同的应对方式:计划-准备、回避和精神-积极应对。精神应对在孕期使用最为频繁;回避应对使用最少。正如所假设的,精神应对和回避应对在孕期有所不同。计划在不同时间使用更为一致。多元回归分析显示,计划的最强预测因素是高度乐观和特定于孕期的困扰。回避的最强预测因素是高度状态焦虑和特定于孕期的困扰。更高的宗教信仰和乐观是精神应对的最强预测因素。这些结果进一步证明了女性在产前使用独特且多样的策略来管理压力。它们还表明,应对方式对孕期不断变化的需求有反应,并反映了女性的特征、认知和社会状况。