de Langen Joyce, van Hunsel Florence, Passier Anneke, de Jong-van den Berg Lolkje, van Grootheest Kees
Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):515-24. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831060-00006.
There has been discussion about the acceptance of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported by patients to spontaneous reporting systems. Lack of experience with patient reporting in real life was one of the main drawbacks in this debate. This study covers 3 years of experience with patient reporting in daily practice. We compared patient reports with reports from healthcare professionals. Although patients have the opportunity to report ADRs in several countries, little is published in the literature about the contribution that patient reports have in practice. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to describe long-term experiences with patient reporting as part of a spontaneous reporting system.
The number of reports received, age and sex of the reporters, characteristics of the most frequently reported drugs and characteristics of the ADRs (most frequently reported ADRs, seriousness, outcome) in a 3-year period (April 2004-April 2007) were compared between patient reports and reports from healthcare professionals.
During this 3-year period, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb received 2522 reports directly from patients, concerning 5401 ADRs. In the same period, healthcare professionals submitted 10 635 reports, concerning 16 722 ADRs. Differences were found in the categories of seriousness and outcome of the reported ADRs between patients and healthcare professionals. Conversely, similarities between patient reports and reports from healthcare professionals were found in age, sex, most frequently reported ADRs and most frequently reported drugs.
Our study highlights clearly that valuable differences between ADR reports from patients and reports from healthcare professionals exist. Differences in interpretation by patients and healthcare professionals may cause the observed disparities in seriousness and outcome of reported ADRs. However, the similarities between patient reports and reports from healthcare professionals in most frequently reported ADRs and most frequently reported drugs are striking. After 3 years of experience with patient reporting, we conclude that patient reporting in spontaneous reporting systems is feasible and that it contributes significantly to a reliable pharmacovigilance.
关于患者向自发报告系统报告的药品不良反应(ADR)的可接受性一直存在讨论。在现实生活中缺乏患者报告经验是这场辩论的主要缺点之一。本研究涵盖了3年日常实践中患者报告的经验。我们将患者报告与医疗保健专业人员的报告进行了比较。尽管在几个国家患者都有机会报告药品不良反应,但关于患者报告在实践中的贡献,文献中鲜有发表。据我们所知,本文是首次描述作为自发报告系统一部分的患者报告的长期经验。
比较了3年期间(从2004年4月至2007年4月)患者报告和医疗保健专业人员报告中收到的报告数量、报告者的年龄和性别、最常报告药品的特征以及药品不良反应的特征(最常报告的药品不良反应、严重程度、结果)。
在这3年期间,荷兰药物警戒中心Lareb直接收到了2522份来自患者的报告,涉及5401例药品不良反应。同期,医疗保健专业人员提交了10635份报告,涉及16722例药品不良反应。在报告的药品不良反应的严重程度和结果类别方面,患者和医疗保健专业人员之间存在差异。相反,在年龄、性别、最常报告的药品不良反应和最常报告的药品方面,患者报告与医疗保健专业人员的报告存在相似之处。
我们的研究清楚地表明,患者报告的药品不良反应与医疗保健专业人员报告的药品不良反应之间存在有价值的差异。患者和医疗保健专业人员在解读上的差异可能导致所观察到的报告的药品不良反应在严重程度和结果方面的差异。然而,患者报告与医疗保健专业人员报告在最常报告的药品不良反应和最常报告的药品方面的相似之处非常显著。经过3年的患者报告经验,我们得出结论,自发报告系统中的患者报告是可行的,并且对可靠的药物警戒有重大贡献。