Malmberg Kenneth J
Department of Psychology, PCD 4118G, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Dec;57(4):335-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 May 15.
The development of formal models has aided theoretical progress in recognition memory research. Here, I review the findings that are critical for testing them, including behavioral and brain imaging results of single-item recognition, plurality discrimination, and associative recognition experiments under a variety of testing conditions. I also review the major approaches to measurement and process modeling of recognition. The review indicates that several extant dual-process measures of recollection are unreliable, and thus they are unsuitable as a basis for forming strong conclusions. At the process level, however, the retrieval dynamics of recognition memory and the effect of strengthening operations suggest that a recall-to-reject process plays an important role in plurality discrimination and associative recognition, but not necessarily in single-item recognition. A new theoretical framework proposes that the contribution of recollection to recognition depends on whether the retrieval of episodic details improves accuracy, and it organizes the models around the construct of efficiency. Accordingly, subjects adopt strategies that they believe will produce a desired level of accuracy in the shortest amount of time. Several models derived from this framework are shown to account the accuracy, latency, and confidence with which the various recognition tasks are performed.
形式模型的发展有助于识别记忆研究的理论进展。在此,我回顾了对检验这些模型至关重要的研究发现,包括在各种测试条件下单项识别、复数辨别和联想识别实验的行为及脑成像结果。我还回顾了识别测量和过程建模的主要方法。该综述表明,现有的几种双重加工的回忆测量方法不可靠,因此不适宜作为得出有力结论的依据。然而,在过程层面,识别记忆的检索动态以及强化操作的效果表明,回忆到拒绝的过程在复数辨别和联想识别中发挥重要作用,但在单项识别中不一定如此。一个新的理论框架提出,回忆对识别的贡献取决于情景细节的检索是否提高了准确性,并且它围绕效率这一结构来组织模型。因此,受试者采用他们认为能在最短时间内产生所需准确性水平的策略。从该框架衍生出的几个模型被证明能够解释执行各种识别任务的准确性、潜伏期和信心。