Moberget Torgeir, Karns Christina M, Deouell Leon Y, Lindgren Magnus, Knight Robert T, Ivry Richard B
Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2569-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Two hypotheses concerning cerebellar function and predictive behavior are the sensory prediction hypothesis and the timing hypothesis. The former postulates that the cerebellum is critical in generating expectancies regarding forthcoming sensory information. The latter postulates that this structure is critical in generating expectancies that are precisely timed; for example, the expected duration of an event or the time between events. As such, the timing hypothesis constitutes a more specific form of prediction. The present experiment contrasted these two hypotheses by examining the mismatch negativity (MMN) response in patients with cerebellar cortical atrophy and matched controls. While watching a silent movie, a stream of task-irrelevant sounds was presented. A standard sound was presented 60% of the time, whereas the remaining sounds deviated from the standard on one of four dimensions: duration, intensity, pitch, or location. The timing between stimuli was either periodic or aperiodic. Based on the sensory prediction hypothesis, the MMN for the patients should be abnormal across all four dimensions. In contrast, the timing hypothesis would predict a selective impairment of the duration MMN. Moreover, the timing hypothesis would also predict that the enhancement of the MMN observed in controls when the stimuli are presented periodically should be attenuated in the patients. Compared to controls, the patients exhibited a delayed latency in the MMN to duration deviants and a similar trend for the intensity deviants, while pitch and location MMNs did not differ between groups. Periodicity had limited and somewhat inconsistent effects. The present results are at odds with a general role for the cerebellum in sensory prediction and provide partial support for the timing hypothesis.
关于小脑功能和预测行为有两种假说,即感觉预测假说和时间假说。前者假定小脑在生成关于即将到来的感觉信息的预期方面至关重要。后者假定该结构在生成精确计时的预期方面至关重要;例如,一个事件的预期持续时间或事件之间的时间间隔。因此,时间假说构成了一种更具体的预测形式。本实验通过检查小脑皮质萎缩患者和匹配对照组的失配负波(MMN)反应来对比这两种假说。在观看无声电影时,会呈现一系列与任务无关的声音。标准声音出现的时间占60%,而其余声音在持续时间、强度、音高或位置这四个维度中的一个维度上与标准不同。刺激之间的时间间隔要么是周期性的,要么是非周期性的。基于感觉预测假说,患者在所有四个维度上的MMN都应该异常。相比之下,时间假说预测持续时间MMN会有选择性损伤。此外,时间假说还预测,当周期性呈现刺激时,对照组中观察到的MMN增强在患者中应该会减弱。与对照组相比,患者对持续时间偏差的MMN潜伏期延迟,对强度偏差也有类似趋势,而音高和位置MMN在两组之间没有差异。周期性的影响有限且有些不一致。目前的结果与小脑在感觉预测中的一般作用不一致,并为时间假说提供了部分支持。