• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知对食物摄入的影响:操控近期饮食记忆的效果。

Cognitive influences on food intake: the effects of manipulating memory for recent eating.

作者信息

Higgs Suzanne

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, England, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2008 Aug 6;94(5):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.012
PMID:18486159
Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that enhancing memory of the last meal decreases later snack intake, whereas disruption of encoding in memory of the last meal increases subsequent snack intake. Other studies have found that manipulating cognitions at the time of eating, such as beliefs about the timing and composition of meals, can affect subsequent intake. The effects of many of these cognitions are likely to depend on prior association in memory between situational and sensory cues and particular postingestional or affective consequences of eating. Hence, memory for the specific attributes of foods eaten in the recent past, and memory for the predicted consequences of eating acquired over repeated experiences are important influences on food intake. These data are consistent with evidence of hyperphagia in amnesic patients and laboratory animals with lesions to the hippocampus, an important substrate for learning and memory.

摘要

最近的证据表明,增强对最后一餐的记忆会减少随后的零食摄入量,而破坏对最后一餐的记忆编码则会增加随后的零食摄入量。其他研究发现,在进食时操纵认知,比如对进餐时间和食物构成的信念,会影响随后的摄入量。许多这些认知的影响可能取决于情境和感官线索与进食后特定的生理或情感后果在记忆中的先前关联。因此,对近期所吃食物的具体属性的记忆,以及对通过反复体验获得的进食预期后果的记忆,是影响食物摄入量的重要因素。这些数据与失忆症患者和海马体受损的实验动物出现食欲亢进的证据一致,海马体是学习和记忆的重要基础。

相似文献

1
Cognitive influences on food intake: the effects of manipulating memory for recent eating.认知对食物摄入的影响:操控近期饮食记忆的效果。
Physiol Behav. 2008 Aug 6;94(5):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
2
External cues in the control of food intake in humans: the sensory-normative distinction.人类食物摄入控制中的外部线索:感官规范区分
Physiol Behav. 2008 Aug 6;94(5):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.014. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
3
Recall of recent lunch and its effect on subsequent snack intake.回忆近期午餐及其对随后零食摄入量的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jun 9;94(3):454-62. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Internal and external moderators of the effect of variety on food intake.品种对食物摄入量影响的内部和外部调节因素。
Psychol Bull. 2009 May;135(3):434-51. doi: 10.1037/a0015327.
5
Eating slowly led to decreases in energy intake within meals in healthy women.在健康女性中,细嚼慢咽会导致用餐时能量摄入减少。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jul;108(7):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.026.
6
Caloric restriction in the presence of attractive food cues: external cues, eating, and weight.在存在诱人食物线索的情况下进行热量限制:外部线索、饮食与体重。
Physiol Behav. 2008 Aug 6;94(5):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
7
Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others.进餐情况对食物摄入量的影响:独自进餐与与他人一起进餐的比较。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.025. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
8
Understanding variety: tasting different foods delays satiation.了解多样性:品尝不同食物会延迟饱腹感。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Feb 28;87(2):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.012. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
9
Memory inhibition and energy regulation.记忆抑制与能量调节。
Physiol Behav. 2005 Dec 15;86(5):731-46. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
10
Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women.午餐时看电视会增加年轻女性下午的零食摄入量。
Appetite. 2009 Feb;52(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual Framework for Nutritional Psychology as a New Field of Research.作为一个新研究领域的营养心理学概念框架。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;15(8):1007. doi: 10.3390/bs15081007.
2
Seeing Is Craving: Neural Dynamics of Appetitive Processing During Food-Cue Video Watching and Its Impact on Obesity.眼见即渴望:观看食物线索视频期间食欲加工的神经动力学及其对肥胖的影响。
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 27;17(15):2449. doi: 10.3390/nu17152449.
3
Computationally Modeling the Physiologic Impact of the Ratio of Fats to Carbohydrates in the Diet on Intake Among Metabolically Healthy Adults.
对饮食中脂肪与碳水化合物比例对代谢健康成年人摄入量的生理影响进行计算建模。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2025 Jun 19;9(7):107487. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107487. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Separate orexigenic hippocampal ensembles shape dietary choice by enhancing contextual memory and motivation.不同的促食欲海马神经元群通过增强情境记忆和动机来塑造饮食选择。
Nat Metab. 2025 Feb;7(2):276-296. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-01194-6. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
5
Associations between body mass index and episodic memory for recent eating, mindful eating, and cognitive distraction: A cross-sectional study.体重指数与近期饮食的情景记忆、正念饮食和认知分心之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Jan 4;10(1):e728. doi: 10.1002/osp4.728. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Cognitive Impairment Mediates the Association between Dietary Inflammation and Depressive Symptoms in the Elderly.认知障碍在饮食炎症与老年人抑郁症状之间起中介作用。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 2;14(23):5118. doi: 10.3390/nu14235118.
7
Memory regulation in feeding habit transformation to dead prey fish of Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi).记忆调控在鳜鱼(翘嘴红鲌)摄食习性转变至死鱼行为中的作用。
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2021 Dec;47(6):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s10695-021-01001-z. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks.进食的生理控制:信号、神经元和网络。
Physiol Rev. 2022 Apr 1;102(2):689-813. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2020. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Structural and functional brain alterations in anorexia nervosa:A multimodal meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.神经性厌食症的结构和功能脑改变:神经影像学研究的多模态荟萃分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):5154-5169. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25602. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
10
Inhibiting ventral hippocampal NMDA receptors and increases energy intake in male rats.抑制腹侧海马 NMDA 受体可增加雄性大鼠的能量摄入。
Learn Mem. 2021 May 19;28(6):187-194. doi: 10.1101/lm.053215.120. Print 2021 Jun.