Gupta Aditya K, Zaman Muhammad, Singh Jagpal
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 May-Jun;98(3):224-8. doi: 10.7547/0980224.
A high rate of false-negative dermatophyte detection is observed when the most common laboratory methods are used. These methods include microscopic observation of potassium hydroxide-digested nail clippings and culture methods using agar-based media supplemented with cycloheximide, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin to isolate dermatophytes. Microscopic detection methods that use calcofluor white staining or periodic acid-Schiff staining may also be substituted for and have previously been reported to be more sensitive than potassium hydroxide-digested nail clippings.
Trichophyton rubrum infections were detected directly from nails in a double-round polymerase chain reaction assay that uses actin gene-based primers. This method was compared with detection of fungal hyphae by using calcofluor white fluorescence microscopy of nail samples collected from 83 patients with onychomycosis who were undergoing antifungal drug therapy.
Twenty-six of 83 samples (31.3%) were found to be positive by calcofluor white fluorescence microscopy, and 21 of 83 samples (25.3%) yielded positive results for T rubrum when actin gene-based primers in a double-round polymerase chain reaction assay were used. When calcofluor white fluorescence microscopy and polymerase chain reaction assay were used, the combined detection was 46.9% compared with 31.3% when calcofluor microscopy and culture of nail samples on Sabouraud's dextrose agar supplemented with cycloheximide, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin were used.
These results suggest that the use of a direct DNA protocol is an alternative method for detecting Trichophyton infections. When this protocol is used, the presence of T rubrum DNA is directly detected. However, the viability of the dermatophyte is not addressed, and further methods need to be developed for the detection of viable T rubrum directly from nail samples.
使用最常见的实验室方法时,皮肤癣菌检测的假阴性率较高。这些方法包括对氢氧化钾消化后的指甲剪进行显微镜观察,以及使用添加了放线菌酮、氯霉素和庆大霉素的基于琼脂的培养基进行培养以分离皮肤癣菌的方法。使用荧光增白剂染色或过碘酸 - 希夫染色的显微镜检测方法也可以替代,并且先前已报道其比氢氧化钾消化后的指甲剪更敏感。
在使用基于肌动蛋白基因引物的双轮聚合酶链反应测定中,直接从指甲检测红色毛癣菌感染。将该方法与使用荧光增白剂荧光显微镜对83例接受抗真菌药物治疗的甲癣患者采集的指甲样本进行真菌菌丝检测的方法进行比较。
83份样本中有26份(31.3%)通过荧光增白剂荧光显微镜检测为阳性,当在双轮聚合酶链反应测定中使用基于肌动蛋白基因的引物时,83份样本中有21份(25.3%)红色毛癣菌检测结果为阳性。当使用荧光增白剂荧光显微镜和聚合酶链反应测定时,联合检测率为46.9%,而使用荧光显微镜和在添加了放线菌酮、氯霉素和庆大霉素的沙氏葡萄糖琼脂上培养指甲样本时的联合检测率为31.3%。
这些结果表明,使用直接DNA检测方案是检测红色毛癣菌感染的一种替代方法。使用该方案时,可直接检测红色毛癣菌DNA的存在。然而,未涉及皮肤癣菌的活力问题,需要开发进一步的方法直接从指甲样本中检测活的红色毛癣菌。