• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects.目标之间的空间分离限制了对多个物体的注意力维持。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):390-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.390.
2
Attentional Enhancement of Tracked Stimuli in Early Visual Cortex Has Limited Capacity.早期视觉皮层中被跟踪刺激的注意力增强具有有限的容量。
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 16;42(46):8709-8715. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0605-22.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity.跟踪多个对象受限于对象之间的间隔,而不受速度、时间或容量的限制。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):920-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
4
Not FLEXible enough: Exploring the temporal dynamics of attentional reallocations with the multiple object tracking paradigm.灵活性不足:运用多目标追踪范式探索注意力重新分配的时间动态。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):776-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000187. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets.对移动目标进行注意力追踪所产生的皮质功能磁共振成像激活。
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2657-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.5.2657.
6
Object tracking: absence of long-range spatial interference supports resource theories.目标追踪:不存在远距离空间干扰支持资源理论。
J Vis. 2014 Aug 1;14(6):1. doi: 10.1167/14.6.1.
7
Hemifield Specificity of Attention Response Functions During Multiple Object Tracking.多目标追踪过程中注意反应功能的半视野特异性
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1340-24.2025.
8
Selection enables enhancement: An integrated model of object tracking.选择促进增强:一种目标跟踪的集成模型。
J Vis. 2019 Dec 2;19(14):23. doi: 10.1167/19.14.23.
9
Brain activation during spatial updating and attentive tracking of moving targets.大脑在空间更新和对移动目标的注意跟踪过程中的激活。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Mar;78(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
10
Spatio-temporal dynamics of attentional selection stages during multiple object tracking.多目标跟踪过程中注意选择阶段的时空动态。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:484-491. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.046. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical network modulations associated with prolonged training of the multiple object-tracking task.与多目标追踪任务的长期训练相关的皮层网络调制
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 12;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00577. eCollection 2025.
2
Location- and Object-Based Representational Mechanisms Account for Bilateral Field Advantage in Multiple-Object Tracking.基于位置和对象的表象机制解释了多项物体追踪中的双侧视野优势。
eNeuro. 2024 Mar 26;11(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0519-23.2024. Print 2024 Mar.
3
Serial attentional resource allocation during parallel feature value tracking.在并行特征值跟踪过程中进行连续的注意力资源分配。
Elife. 2023 Dec 15;12:e91183. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91183.
4
Visual tracking assessment in a soccer-specific virtual environment: A web-based study.基于网络的足球专项虚拟环境中的视觉追踪评估:一项网络研究
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269643. eCollection 2022.
5
Multiple Players Tracking in Virtual Reality: Influence of Soccer Specific Trajectories and Relationship With Gaze Activity.虚拟现实中的多人追踪:足球特定轨迹的影响及其与注视活动的关系
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:901438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901438. eCollection 2022.
6
How history trails and set size influence detection of hostile intentions.历史轨迹和集合规模如何影响敌意意图的检测。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 May 12;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00395-5.
7
A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool.神经追踪器感知认知训练工具的关键性系统评价
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1458-1483. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01892-2. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.人类在视觉运动感知中采用分层结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24581-24589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008961117. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Multiple-target tracking in human and machine vision.人类和机器视觉中的多目标跟踪。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 9;16(4):e1007698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007698. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
The Effect of Fearful Expressions on Multiple Face Tracking.恐惧表情对多面部追踪的影响。
Psychol Belg. 2015 Jul 9;55(2):101-117. doi: 10.5334/pb.bi.

本文引用的文献

1
Crowding: Including illusory conjunctions, surround suppression, and attention.拥挤现象:包括错觉性结合、周边抑制和注意力。
J Vis. 2007;7(2):1. doi: 10.1167/7.2.i.
2
Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection.象限性缺损揭示了选择过程中的解剖学限制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13496-500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702685104. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
3
Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields.用于左右视觉半视野注意力追踪的独立资源。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):637-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01587.x.
4
The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution.注意场具有墨西哥帽分布。
Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.003. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
5
Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.拥挤现象不同于普通的掩蔽:它能将特征整合与检测区分开来。
J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69. doi: 10.1167/4.12.12.
6
The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item.注意力的选择性调谐模型:关于被关注项目周围抑制性环带的心理物理学证据。
Vision Res. 2003 Jan;43(2):205-19. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00491-1.
7
The spatial resolution of visual attention.视觉注意力的空间分辨率。
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0755.
8
Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex.感觉抑制的调节:对人类视觉皮层感受野大小的影响
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Sep;86(3):1398-411. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1398.
9
Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.人类视觉中拥挤方向信号的强制平均化。
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44. doi: 10.1038/89532.
10
Evidence for split attentional foci.注意力分散焦点的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):834-46. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.834.

目标之间的空间分离限制了对多个物体的注意力维持。

Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects.

作者信息

Shim Won Mok, Alvarez George A, Jiang Yuhong V

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):390-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.390.

DOI:10.3758/pbr.15.2.390
PMID:18488657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2621007/
Abstract

Humans are limited in their ability to maintain multiple attentional foci. In attentive tracking of moving objects, performance declines as the number of tracked targets increases. Previous studies have interpreted such reduction in terms of a limit in the number of attentional foci. However, increasing the number of targets usually reduces spatial separation among different targets. In this study, we examine the role of target spatial separation in maintaining multiple attentional foci. Results from a multiple-object tracking task show that tracking accuracy deteriorates as the spatial separation between targets decreases. We propose that local interaction between nearby attentional foci modulates the resolution of attention, and that capacity limitation from attentive tracking originates in part from limitations in maintaining critical spacing among multiple attentional foci. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that tracking performance is limited not primarily by a number of locations, but by factors such as the spacing and speed of the targets and distractors.

摘要

人类在维持多个注意力焦点方面的能力有限。在对移动物体的注意力跟踪中,随着被跟踪目标数量的增加,表现会下降。先前的研究根据注意力焦点数量的限制来解释这种下降。然而,增加目标数量通常会减少不同目标之间的空间间隔。在本研究中,我们研究了目标空间间隔在维持多个注意力焦点中的作用。多目标跟踪任务的结果表明,随着目标之间空间间隔的减小,跟踪准确性会下降。我们提出,附近注意力焦点之间的局部相互作用调节了注意力的分辨率,并且注意力跟踪的容量限制部分源于维持多个注意力焦点之间关键间距的限制。这些发现与以下假设一致:跟踪性能受限主要不是因为位置数量,而是受目标和干扰物的间距及速度等因素影响。