• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断

Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.

作者信息

Sabbatini Gloria, Visalberghi Elisabetta

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Italy.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156
PMID:18489231
Abstract

The authors tested the ability of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) to make inferences about hidden food. In Experiment 1, we showed the content of 2 boxes, 1 of which was baited (visual condition, VC) or we shook both boxes producing noise from the baited box (auditory condition, AC). Seven subjects (out of 8) were above chance in the VC, whereas only 1 was above chance in AC. During treatment, by manipulating empty and filled objects subjects experienced the relation between noise and content. When tested again, 7 capuchins were above chance in the VC and 3 in AC. In Experiment 2, we gave visual or auditory information only about the empty box and, consequently, successful choice implied inferential reasoning. All subjects (out of 4) were above chance in the VC, and 2 in the AC. Control tests ruled out the possibility that success resulted from simply avoiding the shaken noiseless box, or from the use of arbitrary auditory information. Similar to apes (Call, 2004), capuchins were capable of inferential reasoning.

摘要

作者测试了卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对隐藏食物进行推理的能力。在实验1中,我们展示了两个盒子的内容,其中一个装有诱饵(视觉条件,VC),或者我们摇晃两个盒子,从装有诱饵的盒子中发出噪音(听觉条件,AC)。在视觉条件下,8只猴子中有7只的表现高于随机水平,而在听觉条件下只有1只高于随机水平。在训练过程中,通过操作空的和装满东西的物体,猴子们体验到了噪音和内容之间的关系。再次测试时,7只卷尾猴在视觉条件下表现高于随机水平,3只在听觉条件下表现高于随机水平。在实验2中,我们只给出了关于空盒子的视觉或听觉信息,因此,成功的选择意味着推理。所有4只猴子在视觉条件下的表现都高于随机水平,2只在听觉条件下高于随机水平。对照测试排除了成功是由于简单地避开摇晃时没有声音的盒子,或者是由于使用任意听觉信息的可能性。与猿类(卡尔,2004年)相似,卷尾猴具备推理能力。

相似文献

1
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.
2
Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的类比推理
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):167-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167.
3
Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?卷尾猴(僧帽猴)多余的食物搜寻行为:元认知的失败?
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2. Epub 2005 Sep 24.
4
The relative use of proximity, shape similarity, and orientation as visual perceptual grouping cues in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans (Homo sapiens).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)和人类(智人)将接近度、形状相似性和方向作为视觉感知分组线索的相对运用情况。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):56-68. doi: 10.1037/a0012674.
5
Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use positive, but not negative, auditory cues to infer food location.卷尾猴(Cebus apella)利用积极的、而不是消极的听觉线索来推断食物位置。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0430-5. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
6
Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use visual but not acoustic information to find hidden food items.簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)会自发地利用视觉而非听觉信息来寻找隐藏的食物。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):26-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013128.
7
Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).棕色卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)对数字数量的序数表征。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.79.
8
Inferences about the location of food in lemurs (Eulemur macaco and Eulemur fulvus): a comparison with apes and monkeys.在狐猴(环尾狐猴和褐美狐猴)中关于食物位置的推断:与猿和猴的比较。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Nov;15(6):1075-83. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0531-9. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
9
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
10
Use of visual, acoustic, and olfactory information during embedded invertebrate foraging in brown capuchins (Cebus apella).褐卷尾猴(Cebus apella)在嵌入式无脊椎动物觅食过程中对视觉、听觉和嗅觉信息的利用。
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Jun;118(2):200-5. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.200.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of object permanence, short-term spatial memory, causality, understanding of object properties and gravity across five different ungulate species.跨五个不同有蹄类物种的客体永久性、短期空间记忆、因果关系、物体属性和重力理解的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):13718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64396-8.
2
Is inferential reasoning a distinctly human cognitive feature? Testing reasoning in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).推理是人类特有的认知特征吗?在棉顶狨(Saguinus oedipus)中测试推理能力。
J Comp Psychol. 2023 Nov;137(4):249-264. doi: 10.1037/com0000356. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Both sheep and goats can solve inferential by exclusion tasks.
绵羊和山羊都可以通过排除推理任务。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1631-1644. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01656-y. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
4
The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy.婴儿期排除推理的发展。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Jun;135:101473. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101473. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
5
Wild skuas can use acoustic cues to locate hidden food.野生贼鸥可以利用声音线索来定位隐藏的食物。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Oct;25(5):1357-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01611-x. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
What happened? Do preschool children and capuchin monkeys spontaneously use visual traces to locate a reward?发生了什么?学龄前儿童和卷尾猴会自发地利用视觉痕迹来定位奖励吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 11;288(1956):20211101. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1101. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.领域排斥:野生棕海鸥在没有视觉信息的情况下找到隐藏的食物。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jul;24(4):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01486-4. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.非人类灵长类动物在面临模糊情景时会使用综合规则进行决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190672. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.麦克菲尔关于脊椎动物智力的零假设:来自鸟类认知的见解。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 8;11:1692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01692. eCollection 2020.
10
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.