• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重对有无2型糖尿病患者效用的影响:医学文献综述

The impact of body weight on patient utilities with or without type 2 diabetes: a review of the medical literature.

作者信息

Dennett Susan L, Boye Kristina S, Yurgin Nicole R

机构信息

Strategic Health Outcomes, Carmel, IN 46033, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):478-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00260.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00260.x
PMID:18489671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is a common side effect of many therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Selecting utility values for incorporation into cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of T2DM therapies is difficult because of variations in methodologies to elicit utilities and other study limitations.

METHODS

A review of the medical literature was conducted to identify studies assessing the impact of body weight on patient utility.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles presented either: 1) utility values by body-mass index (BMI) or body weight, or 2) the change in utility scores or quality-adjusted life-years based on unit changes in BMI or body weight. Regardless of the study population or methodology used to elicit utility scores, all studies reviewed found that as body weight increased, patient utility decreased. Utility scores obtained using standard gamble were generally higher than those using time trade-off(TTO) or the EQ-5D. Most studies reported utility scores stratified by BMI and used regression analyses to attribute the difference in utility scores to differences in weight while controlling for other factors. Studies generally assumed a constant change in utility occurs with a one unit change in BMI. Recent studies, however, demonstrate the magnitude of changes in utility may vary depending on 1) valuing weight loss versus weight gain; 2) valuing a small or large change in body weight; and 3) baseline BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Various utility values associated with body weight using different methodologies have been published. Careful consideration should be given to determine the most appropriate utility values to use in CUAs of T2DM therapies.

摘要

背景

体重增加是2型糖尿病(T2DM)多种治疗方法常见的副作用。由于获取效用值的方法存在差异以及其他研究局限性,在T2DM治疗的成本效用分析(CUA)中选择用于纳入的效用值很困难。

方法

对医学文献进行综述,以确定评估体重对患者效用影响的研究。

结果

18篇文章呈现了以下内容之一:1)按体重指数(BMI)或体重划分的效用值,或2)基于BMI或体重单位变化的效用得分或质量调整生命年的变化。无论用于获取效用得分的研究人群或方法如何,所有纳入综述的研究均发现,随着体重增加,患者效用降低。使用标准博弈法获得的效用得分通常高于使用时间权衡法(TTO)或欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)获得的得分。大多数研究报告了按BMI分层的效用得分,并使用回归分析在控制其他因素的同时,将效用得分的差异归因于体重差异。研究通常假定BMI每变化一个单位,效用就会发生恒定变化。然而,最近的研究表明,效用变化的幅度可能因以下因素而异:1)对体重减轻与体重增加的估值;2)对体重小幅度或大幅度变化的估值;3)基线BMI。

结论

已发表了使用不同方法得出的与体重相关的各种效用值。在T2DM治疗的CUA中,应仔细考虑以确定最适合使用的效用值。

相似文献

1
The impact of body weight on patient utilities with or without type 2 diabetes: a review of the medical literature.体重对有无2型糖尿病患者效用的影响:医学文献综述
Value Health. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):478-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00260.x.
2
Obese versus non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: patient-reported outcomes and utility of weight change.肥胖与非肥胖2型糖尿病患者:患者报告的结局及体重变化的效用
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Sep;23(9):2051-62. doi: 10.1185/030079907X219454.
3
The impact on utilities of differences in body weight among Canadian patients with type 2 diabetes.加拿大2型糖尿病患者体重差异对公用事业的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jul;30(7):1267-73. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.899207. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Estimation of the relationship between body mass index and EQ-5D health utilities in individuals with type 2 diabetes: evidence from the population-based KORA studies.基于人群的 KORA 研究评估 2 型糖尿病患者的体质指数与 EQ-5D 健康效用值之间的关系。
J Diabetes Complications. 2012 Sep-Oct;26(5):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
5
Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses.已发表的成本效用分析中健康效用测量的趋势。
Value Health. 2006 Jul-Aug;9(4):213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00116.x.
6
Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.评估类风湿关节炎中的效用值:时间权衡法与欧洲五维度健康量表的比较
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):751-6. doi: 10.1002/art.22226.
7
Application of classic utilities to published pediatric cost-utility studies.经典效用方法在已发表的儿科成本效用研究中的应用。
Acad Pediatr. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
Evaluation of the association between the EQ-5D (health-related utility) and body mass index (obesity) in hospital-treated people with Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes and with no diagnosed diabetes.评估1型糖尿病、2型糖尿病及未确诊糖尿病的住院患者中EQ-5D(健康相关效用值)与体重指数(肥胖)之间的关联。
Diabet Med. 2005 Nov;22(11):1482-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01657.x.
9
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of obesity surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes in three European countries.欧洲三个国家2型糖尿病患者肥胖症手术的成本效益和预算影响
Obes Surg. 2006 Nov;16(11):1488-503. doi: 10.1381/096089206778870067.
10
Health state utilities associated with weight loss: preferences of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.与体重减轻相关的健康状态效用:日本 2 型糖尿病和肥胖患者的偏好。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):370-380. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2316400. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis of behavioural, pharmacological, and surgical obesity treatments in Canada.加拿大行为、药物和手术肥胖治疗的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Oct;27(10):5748-5760. doi: 10.1111/dom.16627. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of targeted-release formulation of budesonide (Tarpeyo) in conjunction with optimized renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) therapy relative to optimized RASi therapy alone for adults with primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the United States.在美国,布地奈德(Tarpeyo)靶向释放制剂联合优化肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)治疗相对于单独使用优化RASi治疗对原发性免疫球蛋白A肾病成人患者的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 May;31(5):499-509. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.499.
3
Tirzepatide vs semaglutide and liraglutide for weight loss in patients with overweight or obesity without diabetes: A short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States.替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽和利拉鲁肽用于无糖尿病超重或肥胖患者减肥的疗效比较:美国的一项短期成本效益分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 May;31(5):441-450. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.441.
4
Association of continuous BMI with health-related quality of life in the United States by age and sex.连续 BMI 与美国按年龄和性别划分的健康相关生活质量的关联。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024 Nov;32(11):2198-2206. doi: 10.1002/oby.24141. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
5
Cost-effectiveness of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review of economic evaluations.代谢手术治疗 2 型糖尿病和肥胖的成本效益:经济评估的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):575-590. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01494-2. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
Disutility of injectable therapies in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: general population preferences in the UK, Canada, and China.肥胖和 2 型糖尿病患者对注射治疗的厌恶:英国、加拿大和中国普通人群的偏好。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Mar;24(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01470-w. Epub 2022 May 8.
7
Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Gastric Bypass in Patients With Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.严重肥胖合并 2 型糖尿病患者的药物治疗、袖状胃切除术和胃旁路手术的成本效果估计。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148317. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48317.
8
One Hundred Years of Insulin: Value Beyond Price in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.胰岛素百年:2型糖尿病中价值超越价格
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jun;12(6):1593-1604. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01061-7. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Q-Finder: An Algorithm for Credible Subgroup Discovery in Clinical Data Analysis - An Application to the International Diabetes Management Practice Study.Q-Finder:一种用于临床数据分析中可信亚组发现的算法——在国际糖尿病管理实践研究中的应用
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Dec 17;3:559927. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.559927. eCollection 2020.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Saxagliptin/Dapagliflozin Versus Gliclazide and Insulin Glargine: Economic Implications of the Outcomes of the CVD-Real Studies I and II.沙格列汀/达格列净与格列齐特及甘精胰岛素的成本-效用分析:CVD-Real研究I和II结果的经济影响
Health Serv Insights. 2020 Jun 16;13:1178632920929982. doi: 10.1177/1178632920929982. eCollection 2020.