• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与南非罗布斯塔(Aspalathus linearis)枯萎病相关的拟茎点霉属(Phomopsis spp.)的特征描述。

Characterisation of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa.

机构信息

ARC Plant Protection Research Institute, P. Bag X5017, Stellenbosch, 7599.

出版信息

Stud Mycol. 2006;55:65-74. doi: 10.3114/sim.55.1.65.

DOI:10.3114/sim.55.1.65
PMID:18490972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2104715/
Abstract

Die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) causes substantial losses in commercial Aspalathus plantations in South Africa. In the past, the disease has been attributed to Phomopsis phaseoli (teleomorph: Diaporthe phaseolorum). Isolates obtained from diseased plants, however, were highly variable with regard to morphology and pathogenicity. The aim of the present study was thus to identify the Phomopsis species associated with die-back of rooibos. Isolates were subjected to DNA sequence comparisons of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) and partial sequences of the translation elongation factor-1 alpha gene. Furthermore, isolates were also compared in glasshouse inoculation trials on 8-mo-old potted plants to evaluate their pathogenicity. Five species were identified, of which D. aspalathi (formerly identified as D. phaseolorum or D. phaseolorum var. meridionalis) proved to be the most virulent, followed by D. ambigua, Phomopsis theicola, one species of Libertella and Phomopsis, respectively, and a newly described species, P. cuppatea. A description is also provided for D. ambigua based on a newly designated epitype specimen.

摘要

南非商业化罗布斯塔茶(Aspalathus linearis)种植园的罗布斯塔茶枯萎病造成了巨大损失。过去,这种疾病被归因于 Phomopsis phaseoli(同物异名:Diaporthe phaseolorum)。然而,从患病植物中获得的分离物在形态和致病性方面差异很大。因此,本研究的目的是鉴定与罗布斯塔茶枯萎病相关的 Phomopsis 物种。对分离物进行了内部转录间隔区(ITS1、5.8S、ITS2)和翻译延伸因子-1α基因部分序列的 DNA 序列比较。此外,还在温室接种试验中对 8 个月大的盆栽植物进行了比较,以评估其致病性。鉴定出了 5 个物种,其中 D. aspalathi(以前被鉴定为 D. phaseolorum 或 D. phaseolorum var. meridionalis)是最毒的,其次是 D. ambigua、Phomopsis theicola、Libertella 的一个种和 Phomopsis,以及一个新描述的种 P. cuppatea。还根据新指定的模式标本对 D. ambigua 进行了描述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/462ae9994c9a/65fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/2fdfd3ce508f/65fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/17431ef649fe/65fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/a863081ea79b/65fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/0bf2cbbb7cbd/65fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/a83e970fce80/65fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/462ae9994c9a/65fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/2fdfd3ce508f/65fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/17431ef649fe/65fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/a863081ea79b/65fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/0bf2cbbb7cbd/65fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/a83e970fce80/65fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdf/2104715/462ae9994c9a/65fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterisation of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa.与南非罗布斯塔(Aspalathus linearis)枯萎病相关的拟茎点霉属(Phomopsis spp.)的特征描述。
Stud Mycol. 2006;55:65-74. doi: 10.3114/sim.55.1.65.
2
Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Grouping of Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla Isolates from Soybean.大豆上的叶点霉和长蠕孢菌的分子鉴定和系统发育分组。
Phytopathology. 1998 Dec;88(12):1306-14. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.12.1306.
3
Molecular Detection of Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla from Soybean Seeds.大豆种子中菜豆壳球孢菌和长喙壳菌的分子检测。
Phytopathology. 1999 Sep;89(9):796-804. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.9.796.
4
Using PCR to Distinguish Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla from Other Soybean Fungal Pathogens and to Detect Them in Soybean Tissues.利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)区分菜豆壳色二孢菌和菜豆拟茎点霉与其他大豆真菌病原体,并在大豆组织中检测它们。
Plant Dis. 1997 Oct;81(10):1143-1149. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.10.1143.
5
[Morphologic and molecular characterization of Phomopsis longicolla(teleomorph unknown: Diaporthales) from tempered and subtropical regions of Argentina].[来自阿根廷温带和亚热带地区的长孢拟茎点霉(有性型未知:座囊菌目)的形态学和分子特征]
Rev Biol Trop. 2015 Sep;63(3):871-84.
6
Morphologic, Molecular, and Pathogenic Characterization of Diaporthe phaseolorum Variability in the Core Soybean-Producing Area of Argentina.阿根廷核心大豆产区中互隔交链孢形态学、分子学和病原特性变异研究
Phytopathology. 2003 Feb;93(2):136-46. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.2.136.
7
First Report of Soybean Stem Canker Caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora in Argentina.阿根廷菜豆壳球孢大豆茎溃疡病菌引起大豆茎溃疡病的首次报道
Plant Dis. 2001 Jan;85(1):95. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.95B.
8
Pythium cederbergense sp. nov. and related taxa from Pythium clade G associated with the South African indigenous plant Aspalathus linearis (rooibos).新种雪松节壶菌和与南非本土植物 Aspalathus linearis(南非博士茶)相关的 Pythium 属 G 分支的相关分类群。
Mycologia. 2013 Sep-Oct;105(5):1174-89. doi: 10.3852/12-322. Epub 2013 May 25.
9
First Report on Pathogenic Variability of Different Isolates of Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalis on Soybean in Argentina.阿根廷大豆上菜豆壳球孢南方变种不同分离株的致病变异性首次报告
Plant Dis. 1999 Nov;83(11):1071. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.11.1071B.
10
Resolving the Diaporthe species occurring on soybean in Croatia.解析发生在克罗地亚的大豆上的长喙壳属物种。
Persoonia. 2011 Dec;27:9-19. doi: 10.3767/003158511X603719. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Fungicide Sensitivity in Soybean Stem Blight Pathogen , Emphasizing Genetic Variability Impact on Response to SDHI Fungicides Fluopyram and Pydiflumetofen.探究大豆茎枯病病原菌的杀菌剂敏感性,重点关注遗传变异性对其对琥珀酸脱氢酶抑制剂类(SDHI)杀菌剂氟吡菌酰胺和氟唑菌酰羟胺反应的影响。
J Fungi (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;11(4):292. doi: 10.3390/jof11040292.
2
The six whole mitochondrial genomes for the species: features, evolution and phylogeny.该物种的六个完整线粒体基因组:特征、进化与系统发育
IMA Fungus. 2025 Feb 28;16:e140572. doi: 10.3897/imafungus.16.140572. eCollection 2025.
3
New species of (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) from in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic reappraisal of Coniella and Pilidiella, with specific reference to species occurring on Eucalyptus and Vitis in South Africa.对小穴壳菌属和拟小穴壳菌属的系统重新评估,特别提及南非桉属植物和葡萄属植物上出现的物种。
Mycol Res. 2004 Mar;108(Pt 3):283-303. doi: 10.1017/s0953756204009268.
中国**[具体地点未给出]**产**[具体属名未给出]**(间座壳科,间座壳目)新物种。
MycoKeys. 2024 Sep 13;108:317-335. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.108.128983. eCollection 2024.
4
What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?被引用次数最多的100个真菌属有哪些?
Stud Mycol. 2024 Jul;108:1-411. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.108.01. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
An Emerging Disease of Chickpea, Basal Stem Rot Caused by in China.中国一种由[病原体名称缺失]引起的鹰嘴豆新出现病害——基部茎腐病
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;13(14):1950. doi: 10.3390/plants13141950.
6
High species diversity in associated with citrus diseases in China.中国柑橘病害相关的物种多样性高。 (你提供的原文表述不太完整,推测可能是想表达“High species diversity is associated with citrus diseases in China.” )
Persoonia. 2023 Jun;51:229-256. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.51.06. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Species on Palms: Molecular Re-Assessment and Species Boundaries Delimitation in the Species Complex.棕榈科植物:物种复合体的分子重新评估与物种界限划定
Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 6;11(11):2717. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112717.
8
Four new endophytic species of (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) isolated from Cameroon.从喀麦隆分离出的四个新的内生(间座壳科,间座壳目)物种。
MycoKeys. 2023 Oct 23;99:319-362. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.99.110043. eCollection 2023.
9
Molecular Identification and Pathogenicity of and (Diaporthales, Ascomycota) Associated with Cherry Trunk Diseases in China.中国樱桃树干病害相关的葡萄座腔菌属(座囊菌纲,子囊菌门)的分子鉴定及致病性
Microorganisms. 2023 Sep 26;11(10):2400. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102400.
10
Characteristics and Pathogenicity of Isolated from Tea Plant () and Interaction with spp.从茶树()中分离得到的[具体内容未给出]的特征与致病性及其与[具体物种未给出] spp. 的相互作用
Plants (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;12(19):3427. doi: 10.3390/plants12193427.