Suppr超能文献

虾类过敏儿童对斑节对虾(海水虾)或罗氏沼虾(淡水虾)的特异性过敏。

Specific allergy to Penaeus monodon (seawater shrimp) or Macrobrachium rosenbergii (freshwater shrimp) in shrimp-allergic children.

作者信息

Jirapongsananuruk O, Sripramong C, Pacharn P, Udompunturak S, Chinratanapisit S, Piboonpocanun S, Visitsunthorn N, Vichyanond P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jun;38(6):1038-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02979.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergy to specific shrimp species has not been studied systematically by oral challenges. A comparison of allergy to different shrimp species, especially seawater or freshwater varieties treatment, would be useful in testing shrimp-allergic subjects.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify cases of specific allergy to seawater shrimp, Penaeus monodon (Pm), or freshwater shrimp, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Mr), among shrimp-allergic children. Comparisons of skin tests using commercial and crude shrimp extracts plus the prick-to-prick (PTP) method were investigated.

METHODS

Sixty-eight children with a history of shrimp allergy and skin tests positive to shrimp were orally challenged to both shrimp species. Reactivity to skin prick tests using extracts of Pm (PmSPT), Mr (MrSPT), commercial shrimp (ComSPT), and PTP tests (PmPTP, MrPTP) was compared.

RESULTS

Food challenges identified specific allergy to Pm and Mr in 17.65% and 23.53% of the subjects, respectively. Positive and negative challenges to both shrimp species were found in 47.06% and 11.76% of the subjects, respectively. Correlations between the mean weal diameter (MWD) from ComSPT-PmSPT, ComSPT-PmPTP, ComSPT-MrPTP, PmSPT-PmPTP and MrSPT-MrPTP, but not ComSPT-MrSPT, were observed. The MWD from PmSPT and PmPTP were significantly larger in patients with positive than negative challenges to P. monodon (P<0.05). There was a trend that MWD from MrSPT were larger in patients with positive than negative challenges to M. rosenbergii (P=0.058). In the Pm allergy group, PmSPT with an MWD of 30 mm provided 80% predictive probability for positive challenges. PmPTP and ComSPT with an MWD of 22.5 and 20 mm provided 95% predictive probability, respectively. In the Mr allergy group, MrSPT with an MWD of 30 mm provided 95% predictive probability.

CONCLUSION

Specific allergy to Pm or Mr was confirmed by food challenges. SPT using crude extracts and the PTP test are useful tools for screening shrimp sensitization before a food challenge. The predictive probability of SPT is helpful where a food challenge is not feasible.

摘要

背景

尚未通过口服激发试验对特定虾类的过敏情况进行系统研究。比较不同虾类的过敏情况,尤其是海水虾或淡水虾品种的治疗情况,对于检测虾类过敏受试者将是有用的。

目的

本研究的目的是在虾类过敏儿童中识别对海水虾斑节对虾(Pm)或淡水虾罗氏沼虾(Mr)的特异性过敏病例。研究了使用商业虾提取物和粗制虾提取物以及点刺试验(PTP)方法进行皮肤试验的比较。

方法

68名有虾类过敏史且虾类皮肤试验呈阳性的儿童接受了两种虾类的口服激发试验。比较了使用Pm提取物(PmSPT)、Mr提取物(MrSPT)、商业虾提取物(ComSPT)进行皮肤点刺试验的反应性以及PTP试验(PmPTP、MrPTP)的反应性。

结果

食物激发试验分别在17.65%和23.53%的受试者中确定了对Pm和Mr的特异性过敏。分别在47.06%和11.76%的受试者中发现了对两种虾类激发试验的阳性和阴性反应。观察到ComSPT - PmSPT、ComSPT - PmPTP、ComSPT - MrPTP、PmSPT - PmPTP和MrSPT - MrPTP之间的平均风团直径(MWD)存在相关性,但ComSPT - MrSPT之间没有相关性。对斑节对虾激发试验呈阳性的患者,PmSPT和PmPTP的MWD明显大于阴性患者(P<0.05)。对罗氏沼虾激发试验呈阳性的患者,MrSPT的MWD有大于阴性患者的趋势(P = 0.058)。在Pm过敏组中,MWD为30 mm的PmSPT对阳性激发试验的预测概率为80%。MWD为22.5 mm的PmPTP和MWD为20 mm的ComSPT的预测概率分别为95%。在Mr过敏组中,MWD为30 mm的MrSPT的预测概率为95%。

结论

食物激发试验证实了对Pm或Mr的特异性过敏。使用粗制提取物进行皮肤点刺试验和PTP试验是食物激发试验前筛查虾类致敏的有用工具。在食物激发试验不可行的情况下,皮肤点刺试验的预测概率是有帮助的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验