Bellary S, O'Hare J P, Raymond N T, Gumber A, Mughal S, Szczepura A, Kumar S, Barnett A H
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lancet. 2008 May 24;371(9626):1769-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60764-3.
Delivery of high-quality, evidence-based health care to deprived sectors of the community is a major goal for society. We investigated the effectiveness of a culturally sensitive, enhanced care package in UK general practices for improvement of cardiovascular risk factors in patients of south Asian origin with type 2 diabetes.
In this cluster randomised controlled trial, 21 inner-city practices in the UK were assigned by simple randomisation to intervention (enhanced care including additional time with practice nurse and support from a link worker and diabetes-specialist nurse [nine practices; n=868]) or control (standard care [12 practices; n=618]) groups. All adult patients of south Asian origin with type 2 diabetes were eligible. Prescribing algorithms with clearly defined targets were provided for all practices. Primary outcomes were changes in blood pressure, total cholesterol, and glycaemic control (haemoglobin A1c) after 2 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 38297969.
We recorded significant differences between treatment groups in diastolic blood pressure (1.91 [95% CI -2.88 to -0.94] mm Hg, p=0.0001) and mean arterial pressure (1.36 [-2.49 to -0.23] mm Hg, p=0.0180), after adjustment for confounders and clustering. We noted no significant differences between groups for total cholesterol (0.03 [-0.04 to 0.11] mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-0.33 [-2.41 to 1.75] mm Hg), or HbA1c (-0.15% [-0.33 to 0.03]). Economic analysis suggests that the nurse-led intervention was not cost effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio pound28 933 per QALY gained). Across the whole study population over the 2 years of the trial, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and cholesterol decreased significantly by 4.9 (95% CI 4.0-5.9) mm Hg, 3.8 (3.2-4.4) mm Hg, and 0.45 (0.40-0.51) mmol/L, respectively, and we recorded a small and non-significant increase for haemoglobin A1c (0.04% [-0.04 to 0.13]), p=0.290).
We recorded additional, although small, benefits from our culturally tailored care package that were greater than the secular changes achieved in the UK in recent years. Stricter targets in general practice and further measures to motivate patients are needed to achieve best possible health-care outcomes in south Asian patients with diabetes.
为社区贫困群体提供高质量、循证医疗保健是社会的一项主要目标。我们调查了在英国全科医疗中,一套具有文化敏感性的强化护理方案对于改善南亚裔2型糖尿病患者心血管危险因素的有效性。
在这项整群随机对照试验中,英国的21家市中心诊所通过简单随机化被分配到干预组(强化护理,包括增加与执业护士相处的时间、获得联络人员和糖尿病专科护士的支持[9家诊所;n = 868])或对照组(标准护理[12家诊所;n = 618])。所有南亚裔成年2型糖尿病患者均符合条件。为所有诊所提供了具有明确目标的处方算法。主要结局是2年后血压、总胆固醇和血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白)的变化。分析采用意向性分析。该试验已注册,注册号为ISRCTN 38297969。
在对混杂因素和聚类进行调整后,我们记录到治疗组之间在舒张压(1.91[95%CI -2.88至-0.94]mmHg,p = 0.0001)和平均动脉压(1.36[-2.49至-0.23]mmHg,p = 0.0180)方面存在显著差异。我们注意到两组在总胆固醇(0.03[-0.04至0.11]mmol/L)、收缩压(-0.33[-2.41至1.75]mmHg)或糖化血红蛋白(-0.15%[-0.33至0.03])方面无显著差异。经济分析表明,由护士主导的干预措施不具有成本效益(每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比为28933英镑)。在试验的2年期间,整个研究人群的收缩压、舒张压和胆固醇分别显著下降了4.9(95%CI 4.0 - 5.9)mmHg、3.8(3.2 - 4.4)mmHg和0.45(0.40 - 0.51)mmol/L,我们记录到糖化血红蛋白有小幅且不显著的升高(0.04%[-0.04至0.13]),p = 0.290)。
我们记录到,尽管我们的文化定制护理方案带来的益处较小,但仍大于近年来英国所实现的长期变化。在全科医疗中设定更严格的目标以及采取进一步措施激励患者,对于实现南亚裔糖尿病患者尽可能最佳的医疗保健结局是必要的。