• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项中间护理诊所治疗糖尿病的效果和成本效益的整群随机对照试验(ICCD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

A cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Sep 12;13:164. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-164.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-164
PMID:22971356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3512506/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

World-wide healthcare systems are faced with an epidemic of type 2 diabetes. In the United Kingdom, clinical care is primarily provided by general practitioners (GPs) rather than hospital specialists. Intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD) potentially provide a model for supporting GPs in their care of people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and in their management of cardiovascular risk factors. This study aims to (1) compare patients with type 2 diabetes registered with practices that have access to an ICCD service with those that have access only to usual hospital care; (2) assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and (3) explore the views and experiences of patients, health professionals and other stakeholders.

METHODS/DESIGN: This two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (with integral economic evaluation and qualitative study) is set in general practices in three UK Primary Care Trusts. Practices are randomized to one of two groups with patients referred to either an ICCD (intervention) or to hospital care (control). Intervention group: GP practices in the intervention arm have the opportunity to refer patients to an ICCD - a multidisciplinary team led by a specialist nurse and a diabetologist. Patients are reviewed and managed in the ICCD for a short period with a goal of improving diabetes and cardiovascular risk factor control and are then referred back to practice. or

CONTROL GROUP

Standard GP care, with referral to secondary care as required, but no access to ICCD. Participants are adults aged 18 years or older who have type 2 diabetes that is difficult for their GPs to control. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants reaching three risk factor targets: HbA1c (≤7.0%); blood pressure (<140/80); and cholesterol (<4 mmol/l), at the end of the 18-month intervention period. The main secondary outcomes are the proportion of participants reaching individual risk factor targets and the overall 10-year risks for coronary heart disease(CHD) and stroke assessed by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine. Other secondary outcomes include body mass index and waist circumference, use of medication, reported smoking, emotional adjustment, patient satisfaction and views on continuity, costs and health related quality of life. We aimed to randomize 50 practices and recruit 2,555 patients.

DISCUSSION

Forty-nine practices have been randomized, 1,997 patients have been recruited to the trial, and 20 patients have been recruited to the qualitative study. Results will be available late 2012.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

[ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier NCT00945204].

摘要

背景

全球医疗体系正面临着 2 型糖尿病的流行。在英国,临床护理主要由全科医生(GP)提供,而不是由医院专家提供。糖尿病中级护理诊所(ICCD)为支持全科医生管理控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者和管理心血管危险因素提供了一种模式。本研究旨在:(1)比较有 ICCD 服务的实践中注册的 2 型糖尿病患者与仅接受常规医院护理的实践中注册的患者;(2)评估干预措施的成本效益;(3)探索患者、卫生专业人员和其他利益相关者的观点和经验。

方法/设计:这是一项在英国三个初级保健信托基金中的普通实践中进行的双臂集群随机对照试验(具有综合经济评估和定性研究)。实践随机分为两组之一,患者被转介到 ICCD(干预组)或医院护理(对照组)。干预组:干预臂中的 GP 实践有机会将患者转介到 ICCD-一个由专科护士和糖尿病专家领导的多学科团队。患者在 ICCD 中接受短期审查和管理,目标是改善糖尿病和心血管危险因素的控制,然后再转回实践。或

对照组

标准 GP 护理,根据需要转介至二级护理,但无法获得 ICCD。参与者为年龄在 18 岁或以上的 2 型糖尿病患者,其 GP 难以控制。主要结局是在 18 个月干预期结束时达到三个危险因素目标的参与者比例:HbA1c(≤7.0%);血压(<140/80);和胆固醇(<4mmol/l)。主要次要结局是达到个别危险因素目标的参与者比例以及由英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)风险引擎评估的冠心病(CHD)和中风的总体 10 年风险。其他次要结局包括体重指数和腰围、药物使用、报告的吸烟情况、情绪调整、患者满意度和对连续性、成本和健康相关生活质量的看法。我们的目标是随机分配 50 个实践并招募 2555 名患者。

讨论

已经随机分配了 49 个实践,已经向试验招募了 1997 名患者,并且已经向定性研究招募了 20 名患者。结果将于 2012 年底公布。

试验注册

[ClinicalTrials.gov:标识符 NCT00945204]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/3512506/26d87fe7dad7/1745-6215-13-164-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/3512506/26d87fe7dad7/1745-6215-13-164-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/3512506/26d87fe7dad7/1745-6215-13-164-1.jpg

相似文献

1
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项中间护理诊所治疗糖尿病的效果和成本效益的整群随机对照试验(ICCD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Sep 12;13:164. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-164.
2
Evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.糖尿病中级护理诊所(ICCD)的临床及成本效益评估:一项多中心整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e93964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093964. eCollection 2014.
3
A randomised trial of the effect and cost-effectiveness of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe) study.早期强化多因素治疗对筛查发现的2型糖尿病患者5年心血管结局影响及成本效益的随机试验:初级保健中筛查发现糖尿病患者强化治疗的英-丹-荷研究(ADDITION-Europe)
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Aug;20(64):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta20640.
4
The ACHRU-CPP versus usual care for older adults with type-2 diabetes and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.ACHRU-CPP与2型糖尿病及多种慢性病老年患者及其家庭照护者的常规护理对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 6;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1795-9.
5
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.改善家族性乳腺癌遗传咨询的转诊流程:两项干预措施的三项随机对照试验结果
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030.
6
A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist care for diabetes in prevention of cardiovascular diseases: evidence from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.药剂师护理糖尿病预防心血管疾病成本效益的马尔可夫模型:来自北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团的证据
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Mar;19(2):102-14. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.2.102.
7
The impact of supported telemetric monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持性远程监测对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Jul 6;14:198. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-198.
8
9
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.
10
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Population Health Management in Diabetes Care: Combining Clinical Audit, Risk Stratification, and Multidisciplinary Virtual Clinics in a Community Setting to Improve Diabetes Care in a Geographically Defined Population. An Integrated Diabetes Care Pilot in the North East Locality, Oxfordshire, UK.糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理:在社区环境中结合临床审计、风险分层和多学科虚拟诊所,以改善特定地理区域人群的糖尿病护理。英国牛津郡东北部地区的综合糖尿病护理试点项目。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Nov 2;20(4):21. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5177.
2
Hospitalisation among patients with diabetes associated with a Diabetes Integrated Care Initiative: a mixed methods case study.一项与糖尿病综合照护计划相关的糖尿病患者住院情况:混合方法案例研究
Future Hosp J. 2015 Jun;2(2):92-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-2-92.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Lifestyle counseling for type 2 diabetes risk reduction in Dutch primary care: results of the APHRODITE study after 0.5 and 1.5 years.荷兰初级保健中针对 2 型糖尿病风险降低的生活方式咨询:APHRODITE 研究在 0.5 年和 1.5 年后的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1919-25. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2293. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
Glycaemic control is correlated with well-being index (WHO-5) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.在2型糖尿病患者中,血糖控制与幸福感指数(WHO-5)相关。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010 Jun;118(6):364-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243623. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
3
Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.在长期病症管理中,初级保健与专科保健之间的衔接处进行共享护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD004910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3.
4
Evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.糖尿病中级护理诊所(ICCD)的临床及成本效益评估:一项多中心整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e93964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093964. eCollection 2014.
强化血糖控制对糖尿病患者心血管结局和死亡的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1765-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60697-8.
4
Quality of life and quality of care in patients with diabetes experiencing different models of care.接受不同护理模式的糖尿病患者的生活质量和护理质量。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):603-5. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1169. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
5
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
6
Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者血压严格控制后的长期随访
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1565-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806359. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
7
10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病强化血糖控制的10年随访
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
8
Obesity and intermediate clinical outcomes in diabetes: evidence of a differential relationship across ethnic groups.糖尿病中的肥胖与中间临床结局:不同种族群体间差异关系的证据
Diabet Med. 2008 Jun;25(6):685-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02452.x.
9
Enhanced diabetes care to patients of south Asian ethnic origin (the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study): a cluster randomised controlled trial.为南亚裔患者提供强化糖尿病护理(英国亚洲糖尿病研究):一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2008 May 24;371(9626):1769-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60764-3.
10
Socio-economic status, ethnicity and diabetes management: an analysis of time trends using the health survey for England.社会经济地位、种族与糖尿病管理:利用英格兰健康调查对时间趋势的分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Dec;29(4):413-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm058. Epub 2007 Sep 24.