Eis Dieter, Helm Dieter, Mühlinghaus Tilman, Birkner Norbert, Dietel Anne, Eikmann Thomas, Gieler Uwe, Herr Caroline, Lacour Michael, Nowak Dennis, Pedrosa Gil Francisco, Podoll Klaus, Renner Bertold, Andreas Wiesmüller Gerhard, Worm Margitta
Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin, Germany.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008 Oct;211(5-6):658-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 May 27.
In this multicentre study on multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) 291 consecutive environmental medicine (EM) outpatients were examined in several environmental medicine outpatient centres/units throughout Germany in 2000/2003. Of the EM outpatients, 89 were male (30.6%) and 202 were female (69.4%), aged 22-80 (mean 48 years, S.D.=12 years). The sample was representative for university-based environmental outpatient departments and represented a cross-sectional study design with an integrated clinical-based case-control comparison (MCS vs. non-MCS). Three classifications of MCS were used: self-reported MCS (sMCS), clinically diagnosed MCS (cMCS), and formalised computer-assisted MCS with two variants (f1MCS, f2MCS). Data were collected by means of an environmental medicine questionnaire, psychosocial questionnaires, the German version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and a medical baseline documentation, as well as special examinations in partial projects on olfaction and genetic susceptibility markers. The hypothesis guided evaluation of the project showed that the patients' heterogenic health complaints did not indicate a characteristic set of symptoms for MCS. No systematic connection could be observed between complaints and the triggers implicated, nor was there any evidence for a genetic predisposition, or obvious disturbances of the olfactory system. The standardised psychiatric diagnostics applying CIDI demonstrated that the EM patients in general and the subgroup with MCS in particular suffered more often from mental disorders compared to an age and gender matched sample of the general population and that in most patients these disorders commenced many years before environment-related health complaints. Our results do not support the assumption of a toxicogenic-somatic basis of the MCS phenomenon. In contrast, numerous indicators for the relevance of behavioural accentuations, psychic alterations or psychosomatic impairments were found in the group of EM-outpatients with subjective "environmental illness".
在这项关于多重化学敏感性(MCS)的多中心研究中,2000年至2003年期间,在德国各地的多个环境医学门诊中心/科室对291名连续的环境医学(EM)门诊患者进行了检查。在这些EM门诊患者中,89名男性(30.6%),202名女性(69.4%),年龄在22至80岁之间(平均48岁,标准差=12岁)。该样本代表了大学附属环境门诊科室,采用横断面研究设计,并进行了基于临床的病例对照比较(MCS与非MCS)。使用了三种MCS分类:自我报告的MCS(sMCS)、临床诊断的MCS(cMCS)以及具有两种变体的形式化计算机辅助MCS(f1MCS、f2MCS)。通过环境医学问卷、社会心理问卷、德语版综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)、医学基线记录以及嗅觉和遗传易感性标记部分项目的特殊检查来收集数据。该项目的假设导向性评估表明,患者的异质性健康投诉并未表明MCS有一组特征性症状。在投诉与所涉及的触发因素之间未观察到系统联系,也没有遗传易感性或嗅觉系统明显紊乱的证据。应用CIDI进行的标准化精神诊断表明,与年龄和性别匹配的普通人群样本相比,EM患者总体上,尤其是患有MCS的亚组,更常患有精神障碍,并且在大多数患者中,这些障碍在与环境相关的健康投诉出现多年之前就已开始。我们的结果不支持MCS现象存在毒源 - 躯体基础的假设。相反,在主观上有“环境疾病”的EM门诊患者组中发现了许多行为强化、心理改变或身心障碍相关性的指标。