Hassan Shirin E, Turano Kathleen A, Muñoz Beatriz, Munro Cynthia, Roche Karen Bandeen, West Sheila K
Lions Vision Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School ofMedicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4672-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1112. Epub 2008 May 23.
The attentional visual field (AVF), which describes a person's ability to divide attention and extract visual information from the visual field (VF) within a glance, has been shown to be a good predictor of driving performance. Despite this, very little is known about the shape of the AVF and the factors that affect it. The purposes of this study were to describe the AVF in a large sample of older drivers and identify demographic, cognitive, and vision factors associated with AVF performance and shape.
Registered drivers between 67 and 87 years of age, residing in Greater Salisbury, Maryland, were recruited to participate in the study. Participants underwent a battery of visual and cognitive assessments and completed various questionnaires for demographics, medical history, and history of depression. The AVF was assessed using a divided-attention protocol within the central 20 degrees radius along the four principal meridians. The shape of the AVF was classified as either symmetric or one of two asymmetric shape profiles.
Symmetrically shaped AVFs were found in just 34% of participants. AVF performance was significantly better along the horizontal (15.3 degrees ) than the vertical (11.3 degrees ) meridian (P < 0.05). After adjusting for AVF area, we found that poorer cognitive and vision performance was associated with a symmetric AVF shape. Overall AVF extent was predicted by vision and cognitive measures as well as various demographic factors.
Good vision and cognitive ability appear to be associated with having an asymmetric as opposed to a symmetric AVF shape profile.
注意力视野(AVF)描述了一个人在一瞥中分配注意力并从视野(VF)中提取视觉信息的能力,已被证明是驾驶性能的良好预测指标。尽管如此,人们对AVF的形状以及影响它的因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述大量老年驾驶员的AVF,并确定与AVF性能和形状相关的人口统计学、认知和视觉因素。
招募居住在马里兰州索尔兹伯里市的67至87岁注册驾驶员参与研究。参与者接受了一系列视觉和认知评估,并完成了关于人口统计学、病史和抑郁史的各种问卷。使用沿四个主要子午线在中心20度半径范围内的注意力分配协议评估AVF。AVF的形状被分类为对称或两种不对称形状轮廓之一。
仅34%的参与者的AVF形状为对称。AVF在水平子午线(15.3度)上的性能明显优于垂直子午线(11.3度)(P<0.05)。在调整AVF面积后,我们发现较差的认知和视觉性能与对称的AVF形状相关。总体AVF范围由视觉和认知测量以及各种人口统计学因素预测。
良好的视力和认知能力似乎与不对称而非对称的AVF形状相关。