• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure.癌症患者及家属沟通评估工具(CCAT-PF):一项新的测评工具。
Psychooncology. 2008 Dec;17(12):1216-24. doi: 10.1002/pon.1350.
2
Assessing patient-caregiver communication in cancer--a psychometric validation of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool (CCAT-PF) in a German sample.评估癌症患者与照顾者之间的沟通——癌症沟通评估工具(CCAT-PF)在德国样本中的心理测量学验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep;22(9):2473-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2241-0. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
3
Cross-cultural validation of Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in Korea.癌症沟通评估工具在韩国的跨文化验证
Psychooncology. 2015 Feb;24(2):197-203. doi: 10.1002/pon.3629. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
4
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.医患沟通一致性在癌症中的研究——澳大利亚样本中癌症沟通评估工具的改进。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7387-7396. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07163-7. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Assessing Family Caregiver Communication in Chronic Illness: Validation of the FCCT-CI.评估慢性病患者家庭照顾者的沟通情况:FCCT-CI 的验证。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 May;40(5):500-507. doi: 10.1177/10499091221106694. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Understanding cancer caregiver burden over time: Dyadic assessments of family cohesion, conflict and communication.随着时间的推移了解癌症照顾者负担:家庭凝聚力、冲突和沟通的对偶评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1545-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.014. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Hematological cancer patient-caregiver dyadic communication: A longitudinal examination of cancer communication concordance.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者-照护者的双重沟通:癌症沟通一致性的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Oct;29(10):1571-1578. doi: 10.1002/pon.5458. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
The Competence Scale in Managing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (CS-MBPSD) for family caregivers: Instrument development and cross-sectional validation study.家庭照顾者痴呆行为和心理症状管理能力量表(CS-MBPSD):工具开发与横断面验证研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 May;129:104205. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104205. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
The Farsi version of Caregiver Preparedness Scale in Iranian family caregivers of the older adults undergoing hemodialysis: a psychometric study.伊朗老年血液透析患者家庭照顾者的照顾者准备度量表波斯语版本:一项心理测量学研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05103-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy Between Self-Perceived Burden and End-of-Life Communication Difficulties in Cancer Patients.自我效能感在癌症患者自我感知负担与临终沟通困难之间的中介作用
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02661-8.
2
Effects of a communication skills training program to improve capacity to engage in advance care planning in caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas.一项沟通技能培训项目对提高恶性胶质瘤患者照料者参与预先护理计划能力的影响。
J Psychosoc Oncol Res Pract. 2024 Jul-Sep;6(3). doi: 10.1097/or9.0000000000000136. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
The impact of divergent forms of social support on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma and its precursor states.不同形式的社会支持对多发性骨髓瘤及其前体状态患者的健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 31;150(2):55. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05570-9.
4
Dyadic communication in rare cancer: a registry-based study of patients with Erdheim-Chester disease and their caregivers.罕见癌症中的二元沟通:一项基于登记处的厄尔德海姆-切斯特病患者及其照料者的研究。
Blood Adv. 2023 Oct 10;7(19):5904-5910. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010827.
5
Quality of life and informational needs for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant among patients and their caregivers visiting long-term follow-up clinic.前往长期随访门诊的异基因造血干细胞移植患者及其照料者的生活质量和信息需求
Blood Cell Ther. 2022 Mar 25;5(2):35-44. doi: 10.31547/bct-2021-005. eCollection 2022 May 25.
6
Challenges and positive impact of rare cancer caregiving: A mixed-methods study of caregivers of patients with Erdheim-Chester disease and other histiocytic neoplasms.罕见癌症护理的挑战与积极影响:一项关于埃尔迪姆-切斯特病及其他组织细胞肿瘤患者护理者的混合方法研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 23;54:101670. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101670. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Development and feasibility of a communication training to assist caregivers with advanced care planning.一项协助照护者进行临终关怀计划的沟通培训的开发与可行性研究
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Apr;21(2):188-195. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001080.
8
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.医患沟通一致性在癌症中的研究——澳大利亚样本中癌症沟通评估工具的改进。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7387-7396. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07163-7. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
How to Intervene in the Health Management of the Oncological Patient and of Their Caregiver? A Narrative Review in the Psycho-Oncology Field.如何干预肿瘤患者及其照顾者的健康管理?心理肿瘤学领域的叙述性综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;11(7):99. doi: 10.3390/bs11070099.
10
Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy.未来十年增强癌症沟通的多种方法:将研究转化为实践和政策。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):2018-2032. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab089.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life among long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a population-based study.长期非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者的生活质量:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):1659-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22581.
2
Family communication and mental health after breast cancer.乳腺癌后的家庭沟通与心理健康
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006 Sep;15(4):355-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00666.x.
3
Psychosocial adaptation and quality of life among Brazilian patients with different hematological malignancies.不同血液系统恶性肿瘤巴西患者的心理社会适应与生活质量
J Psychosom Res. 2006 May;60(5):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.08.017.
4
Measuring discord in treatment decision-making; progress toward development of a cancer communication and decision-making assessment tool.衡量治疗决策中的不一致性;癌症沟通与决策评估工具的开发进展。
Psychooncology. 2006 Jun;15(6):528-40. doi: 10.1002/pon.989.
5
Social networks and quality of life for long-term survivors of leukemia and lymphoma.白血病和淋巴瘤长期幸存者的社交网络与生活质量
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Feb;14(2):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0856-x. Epub 2005 Jul 9.
6
Cancer caregiving and subjective stress: a multi-site, multi-dimensional analysis.癌症护理与主观压力:一项多地点、多维度分析
Psychooncology. 2005 Sep;14(9):771-85. doi: 10.1002/pon.916.
7
Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden.照顾者与患者沟通的需求未得到满足,照顾者负担加重。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jan;53(1):59-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53011.x.
8
Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues.癌症患者及护理人员的经历:沟通与疼痛管理问题
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Dec;28(6):566-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.005.
9
The challenge of discrepancies in values among physicians, patients, and family members.医生、患者及家庭成员之间价值观差异所带来的挑战。
Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9):1771-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20180.
10
Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: "they don't know what they don't know".在生命末期为家庭照顾者提供支持:“他们不知道自己不知道的事情”。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 28;291(4):483-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.4.483.

癌症患者及家属沟通评估工具(CCAT-PF):一项新的测评工具。

The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure.

作者信息

Siminoff Laura A, Zyzanski Stephen J, Rose Julia Hannum, Zhang Amy Y

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2008 Dec;17(12):1216-24. doi: 10.1002/pon.1350.

DOI:10.1002/pon.1350
PMID:18504807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2830149/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Caregivers and cancer patients frequently have conflicting and unmet communication needs. The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF) is a new instrument that assesses congruence in patient-family caregiver communication for both research and clinical purposes.

METHODS

The scale was developed using a sample of 190 lung cancer patient-caregiver pairs. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale including qualitative item pool development, item reduction and ascertainment of scale properties.

RESULTS

The multiple correlation of the 18-item CCAT-PF scale with the longer 30-item scale was 0.94. All but three items had less than 20% variance accounted for when each item was regressed on the remaining 17, indicating that responses to an individual item were not readily predicted by the remaining items. Test re-test reliability was 0.35 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.49 as the CCAT-PF scale represents the sum of mostly independent items. Higher CCAT-PF scores were significantly correlated with greater patient depression, greater patient perceived family conflict, lower patient-caregiver assessment and well-being and less expressiveness and family cohesion. For both patients and caregivers, physical, functional and emotional well-being were not associated with CCAT-PF scores.

CONCLUSION

The CCAT-PF is a brief but reliable and valid tool. Although administering both family and patient versions is optimal, administering it to a patient or family caregiver only also produces reliable information.

摘要

目的

癌症患者的照料者与患者常常存在相互冲突且未得到满足的沟通需求。患者及家庭癌症沟通评估工具(CCAT-PF)是一种新工具,用于评估患者与家庭照料者之间沟通的一致性,可用于研究和临床目的。

方法

该量表是通过对190对肺癌患者-照料者样本进行开发的。采用标准心理测量程序来开发和测试该量表,包括定性项目池的开发、项目缩减以及量表特性的确定。

结果

18项CCAT-PF量表与更长的30项量表的多重相关系数为0.94。当每个项目在其余17个项目上进行回归时,除了三个项目外,所有项目的方差解释率均低于20%,这表明其余项目不易预测对单个项目的回答。重测信度为0.35,克朗巴哈系数为0.49,因为CCAT-PF量表代表的是大多独立项目的总和。CCAT-PF得分越高,与患者更高的抑郁程度、更强的患者感知到的家庭冲突、更低的患者-照料者评估及幸福感以及更低的表达性和家庭凝聚力显著相关。对于患者和照料者而言,身体、功能和情感幸福感均与CCAT-PF得分无关。

结论

CCAT-PF是一个简短但可靠且有效的工具。虽然同时使用针对家庭和患者的版本是最佳选择,但仅对患者或家庭照料者进行施测也能产生可靠的信息。