Olivera Anna Belsuzarri, Marques Márcia Martins
Departamento de Dentistica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):332-7. doi: 10.2341/07-95.
This in vitro study compared the effects of a gold alloy (Degulor M), four dental ceramics (IPS Empress, IPS Empress 2, Duceram Plus, Duceram LFC) and a laboratory-processed composite (Targis) on the wear of human enamel. The amount of wear of the enamel (dental cusps) and restorative materials (disks) were tested in water at 37 degrees C under standard load (20 N), with a chewing rate of 1.3 Hz and was determined after 150,000 and 300,000 cycles. Before the test, the average surface roughness of the restorative materials was analyzed using the Ra parameter. The results of this study indicate that Targis caused enamel wear similar to Degulor M and resulted in significantly less wear than all the ceramics tested. IPS Empress provoked the greatest amount of enamel wear and Degulor M caused less vertical dimension loss. Targis could be an appropriate alternative material to ceramic, because it is esthetic and produces opposing enamel wear comparable to gold alloy.
这项体外研究比较了一种金合金(Degulor M)、四种牙科陶瓷(IPS Empress、IPS Empress 2、Duceram Plus、Duceram LFC)和一种实验室加工的复合材料(Targis)对人牙釉质磨损的影响。在37摄氏度的水中,在标准载荷(20 N)下,以1.3赫兹的咀嚼频率对牙釉质(牙尖)和修复材料(圆盘)的磨损量进行测试,并在150,000次和300,000次循环后测定。在测试前,使用Ra参数分析修复材料的平均表面粗糙度。这项研究的结果表明,Targis导致的牙釉质磨损与Degulor M相似,并且其磨损量明显低于所有测试的陶瓷。IPS Empress引起的牙釉质磨损量最大,而Degulor M导致的垂直尺寸损失较小。Targis可能是陶瓷的一种合适替代材料,因为它美观,并且产生的牙釉质磨损与金合金相当。