Hoffer Peter T
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Psychoanalytic Center of Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2008 Jun;68(2):128-38. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2008.3.
The publication in 1923 of Sigmund Freud's The Ego and the Id is generally recognized as a watershed event in the history of psychoanalysis. The following year Ferenczi and Rank jointly published a book on psychoanalytic technique, The Development of Psychoanalysis (Ger: Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse), concurrently with the independent publication of Ferenczi's Thalassa: A Theory of Genitality (Ger: Versuch einer Genitaltheorie) and Rank's The Trauma of Birth, the latter of which sparked a storm of controversy within the psychoanalytic community. The ensuing debate over technical and theoretical issues raised in these works signaled the emergence of two rival paradigms (following the model described by Thomas Kuhn) in psychoanalytic technique, the one based on ego psychology and drive-dynamics, the other on preoedipal ego development and object relations, which, when viewed from a present-day vantage point, may be considered complementary. The current crisis in psychoanalysis represents a continuation of this not yet completed paradigm shift.
西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的《自我与本我》于1923年出版,这在精神分析史上通常被视为一个分水岭事件。次年,费伦齐和兰克联合出版了一本关于精神分析技术的书《精神分析的发展》(德语:Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse),与此同时,费伦齐的《大海:关于生殖力的理论》(德语:Versuch einer Genitaltheorie)和兰克的《出生创伤》独立出版,后者在精神分析界引发了一场争议风暴。随后就这些著作中提出的技术和理论问题展开的辩论标志着精神分析技术中出现了两种相互竞争的范式(遵循托马斯·库恩所描述的模式),一种基于自我心理学和驱力动力学,另一种基于前俄狄浦斯期自我发展和客体关系,从当今的视角来看,这两种范式可能是互补的。精神分析当前的危机代表了这一尚未完成的范式转变的延续。