McFadden Emily, Luben Robert, Wareham Nicholas, Bingham Sheila, Khaw Kay-Tee
Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(7):449-58. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9262-2. Epub 2008 May 29.
To investigate the association between occupational social class and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, and the extent to which classical and lifestyle risk factors explain such relationships, and if any differences persist after 65 years of age.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective population study of 22,478 men and women aged 39-79 years living in the general community in Norfolk, United Kingdom, recruited using general practice age-sex registers in 1993-1997 and followed up for total mortality to 2006.
In both men and women an inverse relationship was observed between social class and CVD incidence, with a relative risk of social class V compared to I of 1.90 in men (95% CI 1.47 to 2.47, P < 0.001) and 1.90 in women (95% CI 1.45 to 2.49, P < 0.001). Adjusting for classical and lifestyle risk factors (age, smoking, BMI, systolic blood pressure, total blood cholesterol, history of diabetes, physical activity, weekly alcohol intake and plasma vitamin C levels) had little effect in men; the relative risk of social class V compared to I of 1.70 (95% CI 1.31 to 2.22, P < 0.001), while there was some attenuation seen in women, relative risk of social class V compared to I of 1.56 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.05, P = 0.011). The association persisted in men and women aged > or =65 years.
Some but not all of the socioeconomic differential in CVD incidence can be explained by potentially modifiable classical and lifestyle risk factors. Low social class remains a risk factor for CVD after age 65 years. Further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the association is needed if we are to reduce inequalities in health.
研究职业社会阶层与心血管疾病(CVD)发病率之间的关联,以及经典风险因素和生活方式风险因素对此类关系的解释程度,以及65岁之后是否仍存在差异。
设计、地点和参与者:对22478名年龄在39 - 79岁的男性和女性进行前瞻性人群研究,这些人居住在英国诺福克的普通社区,于1993 - 1997年使用全科医疗年龄 - 性别登记册招募,并随访至2006年的全因死亡率。
在男性和女性中,均观察到社会阶层与CVD发病率呈负相关,与I阶层相比,V阶层的相对风险在男性中为1.90(95%可信区间1.47至2.47,P < 0.001),在女性中为1.90(95%可信区间1.45至2.49,P < 0.001)。对经典风险因素和生活方式风险因素(年龄、吸烟、体重指数、收缩压、总胆固醇、糖尿病史、身体活动、每周酒精摄入量和血浆维生素C水平)进行调整后,对男性影响不大;与I阶层相比,V阶层的相对风险为1.70(95%可信区间1.31至2.22,P < 0.001),而在女性中观察到有所减弱,与I阶层相比,V阶层的相对风险为1.56(95%可信区间1.18至2.05,P = 0.011)。这种关联在65岁及以上的男性和女性中持续存在。
CVD发病率的部分但并非全部社会经济差异可由潜在可改变的经典风险因素和生活方式风险因素来解释。社会阶层较低在65岁之后仍是CVD的一个风险因素。如果我们要减少健康方面的不平等,就需要进一步了解这种关联背后的机制。