Suppr超能文献

[前列腺癌骨转移的检测——全身MRI与骨闪烁显像的比较]

[Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy].

作者信息

Ketelsen D, Röthke M, Aschoff P, Merseburger A S, Lichy M P, Reimold M, Claussen C D, Schlemmer H-P

机构信息

Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Rofo. 2008 Aug;180(8):746-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027479. Epub 2008 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer continues to be the third leading cancer-related mortality of western men. Early diagnosis of bone metastasis is important for the therapy regime and for assessing the prognosis. The standard method is bone scintigraphy. Whole-body MRI proved to be more sensitive for early detection of skeletal metastasis. However, studies of homogenous tumor entities are not available. The aim of the study was to compare bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI regarding the detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

14 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer and a bone scintigraphy as well as whole-body MRI within one month were included. The mean age was 68 years. Scintigraphy was performed using the planar whole-body technique (ventral and dorsal projections). Suspect areas were enlarged. Whole-body MRI was conducted using native T 1w and STIR sequences in the coronary plane of the whole body, sagittal imaging of spine and breath-hold STIR and T 1w-Flash-2D sequences of ribs and chest. Bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI were evaluated retrospectively by experienced radiologists in a consensus reading on a lesion-based level.

RESULTS

Whole-body MRI detected significantly more bone metastasis (p = 0.024). 96.4 % of the demonstrated skeletal metastases in bone scintigraphy were founded in whole-body MRI while only 58.6 % of the depicted metastases in MRI were able to be located in scintigraphy. There was no significant difference regarding bone metastasis greater than one centimeter (p = 0.082) in contrast to metastasis less than one centimeter (p = 0.035). Small osteoblastic metastases showed a considerably higher contrast in T 1w sequences than in STIR imaging. Further advantages of whole-body MRI were additional information about extra-osseous tumor infiltration and their complications, for example stenosis of spinal canal or vertebral body fractures, found in 42.9 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Whole-body MRI using native STIR and T 1w sequences is superior to bone scintigraphy for the detection of small bone metastasis of prostate cancer. Simultaneous clarification of associated complications demonstrates further advantages.

摘要

目的

前列腺癌仍是西方男性癌症相关死亡的第三大原因。骨转移的早期诊断对于治疗方案和预后评估至关重要。标准方法是骨闪烁显像。全身MRI被证明对早期检测骨骼转移更为敏感。然而,目前尚无关于同质肿瘤实体的研究。本研究的目的是比较骨闪烁显像和全身MRI在检测前列腺癌骨转移方面的差异。

材料与方法

纳入14例经组织学证实为前列腺癌且在1个月内进行了骨闪烁显像及全身MRI检查的患者。平均年龄为68岁。骨闪烁显像采用平面全身技术(前后位投照)。对可疑区域进行放大。全身MRI采用全身冠状面的T1加权像和短TI反转恢复(STIR)序列、脊柱矢状位成像以及肋骨和胸部的屏气STIR序列和T1加权快速扰相梯度回波(T1w-Flash-2D)序列。经验丰富的放射科医生对骨闪烁显像和全身MRI进行回顾性评估,并基于病变水平进行一致性解读。

结果

全身MRI检测到的骨转移明显更多(p = 0.024)。骨闪烁显像中显示的骨骼转移灶有96.4%可在全身MRI中找到,而MRI中显示的转移灶只有58.6%能在骨闪烁显像中定位。与小于1厘米的转移灶(p = 0.035)相比,大于1厘米的骨转移灶差异无统计学意义(p = 0.082)。小的成骨细胞转移灶在T1加权序列中的对比度明显高于STIR成像。全身MRI的其他优势在于能提供关于骨外肿瘤浸润及其并发症的额外信息,例如在42.9%的患者中发现的椎管狭窄或椎体骨折。

结论

使用T1加权像和STIR序列的全身MRI在检测前列腺癌小骨转移方面优于骨闪烁显像。同时明确相关并发症显示出更多优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验