Wang Casey L, Anderson Christina, Leone Tina A, Rich Wade, Govindaswami Balaji, Finer Neil N
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):1083-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1460.
In this study of preterm neonates of <32 weeks, we prospectively compared the use of room air versus 100% oxygen as the initial resuscitation gas.
A 2-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of neonates with gestational ages of 23 to 32 weeks who required resuscitation was performed. The oxygen group was initially resuscitated with 100% oxygen, with decreases in the fraction of inspired oxygen after 5 minutes of life if pulse oxygen saturation was >95%. The room air group was initially resuscitated with 21% oxygen, which was increased to 100% oxygen if compressions were performed or if the heart rate was <100 beats per minute at 2 minutes of life. Oxygen was increased in 25% increments if pulse oxygen saturation was <70% at 3 minutes of life or <80% at 5 minutes of life.
Twenty-three infants in the oxygen group (mean gestational age: 27.6 weeks; range: 24-31 weeks; mean birth weight: 1013 g; range: 495-2309 g) and 18 in the room air group (mean gestational age: 28 weeks; range: 25-31 weeks; mean birth weight: 1091 g; range: 555-1840 g) were evaluated. Every resuscitated patient in the room air group met rescue criteria and received an increase in the fraction of inspired oxygen by 3 minutes of life, 6 patients directly to 100% and 12 with incremental increases. Pulse oxygen saturation was significantly lower in the room air group from 2 to 10 minutes (pulse oxygen saturation at 3 minutes: 55% in the room air group vs 87% in the oxygen group). Heart rates did not differ between groups in the first 10 minutes of life, and there were no differences in secondary outcomes.
Resuscitation with room air failed to achieve our target oxygen saturation by 3 minutes of life, and we recommend that it not be used for preterm neonates.
在这项针对孕周小于32周的早产儿的研究中,我们前瞻性地比较了使用空气与100%氧气作为初始复苏气体的情况。
对孕周为23至32周且需要复苏的新生儿进行了一项2中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。氧气组最初用100%氧气进行复苏,如果出生后5分钟时经皮血氧饱和度>95%,则降低吸入氧分数。空气组最初用21%氧气进行复苏,如果进行了胸外按压或出生后2分钟时心率<100次/分钟,则将氧气浓度增至100%。如果出生后3分钟时经皮血氧饱和度<70%或出生后5分钟时<80%,则以25%的增幅增加氧气浓度。
对氧气组的23例婴儿(平均孕周:27.6周;范围:24 - 31周;平均出生体重:1013 g;范围:495 - 2309 g)和空气组的18例婴儿(平均孕周:28周;范围:25 - 31周;平均出生体重:1091 g;范围:555 - 1840 g)进行了评估。空气组的每例复苏患者均符合抢救标准,且在出生后3分钟时吸入氧分数均有所增加,6例直接增至100%,12例逐步增加。在出生后2至10分钟,空气组的经皮血氧饱和度显著低于氧气组(出生后3分钟时经皮血氧饱和度:空气组为55%,氧气组为87%)。出生后前10分钟两组心率无差异,次要结局也无差异。
使用空气进行复苏在出生后3分钟时未能达到我们的目标血氧饱和度,我们建议不将其用于早产儿。