Montoy M, Euvrard T, Moyen B, Roy P, Rollier J C, Cotton F
Laboratoire d'Anatomie de Rockefeller, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69312, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Oct;30(7):557-62. doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0370-1. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Magnetic resonance imaging has become the method of choice to diagnose meniscal and ligament lesions of the knee. New approaches to the surgical treatment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears led us to try to distinguish the two bundles of that ligament with MRI and to evaluate inter-observer agreement in different viewing planes.
Images of 50 right and 50 left ligament-intact knees were examined in the coronal and axial viewing planes. Each sequence was independently read by a radiologist and a medical student to note, in each viewing plane, the number of images in which the two-bundle structure of the ligament was clearly seen. Cohen's Kappa coefficients were used to determine inter-observer agreements.
The percentage of sequences in which the two bundles were distinguished by the radiologist and the student on one image at least were 82 versus 73% in the coronal plane and 90 versus 93% in the axial plane, respectively. The average number of successive images with clear bundles was higher in the axial (2.7 vs. 1.7) than in the coronal plane (2.2 vs. 1). There was a poor inter-observer agreement in the coronal plane (k=0.176) but an intermediate agreement in the axial plane (k=0.385 or 0.522 depending on number pooling).
The axial viewing plane seems more favourable to distinguish the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament with the best possible reproducibility. An oblique-axial plane is deemed to insure a clearer diagnosis of partial tears.
磁共振成像已成为诊断膝关节半月板和韧带损伤的首选方法。部分前交叉韧带撕裂的外科治疗新方法促使我们尝试通过磁共振成像区分该韧带的两束,并评估不同观察平面上观察者之间的一致性。
对50例右膝和50例左膝韧带完整的膝关节在冠状面和轴位观察平面进行成像检查。每个序列由一名放射科医生和一名医学生独立读取,以记录在每个观察平面上能清晰看到韧带两束结构的图像数量。采用科恩卡方系数来确定观察者之间的一致性。
放射科医生和学生在至少一张图像上区分出两束的序列百分比,在冠状面分别为82%和73%,在轴位面分别为90%和93%。轴位上连续出现清晰束状结构的平均图像数量(2.7对1.7)高于冠状面(2.2对1)。冠状面观察者间一致性较差(k = 0.176),而轴位面一致性中等(k = 0.385或0.522,取决于数据合并方式)。
轴位观察平面似乎更有利于以最佳的可重复性区分前交叉韧带的两束。斜轴位被认为能确保更清晰地诊断部分撕裂。