Meinhardt Sarah, Swint-Kruse Liskin
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA.
Proteins. 2008 Dec;73(4):941-57. doi: 10.1002/prot.22121.
In protein families, conserved residues often contribute to a common general function, such as DNA-binding. However, unique attributes for each homolog (e.g. recognition of alternative DNA sequences) must arise from variation in other functionally-important positions. The locations of these "specificity determinant" positions are obscured amongst the background of varied residues that do not make significant contributions to either structure or function. To isolate specificity determinants, a number of bioinformatics algorithms have been developed. When applied to the LacI/GalR family of transcription regulators, several specificity determinants are predicted in the 18 amino acids that link the DNA-binding and regulatory domains. However, results from alternative algorithms are only in partial agreement with each other. Here, we experimentally evaluate these predictions using an engineered repressor comprising the LacI DNA-binding domain, the LacI linker, and the GalR regulatory domain (LLhG). "Wild-type" LLhG has altered DNA specificity and weaker lacO(1) repression compared to LacI or a similar LacI:PurR chimera. Next, predictions of linker specificity determinants were tested, using amino acid substitution and in vivo repression assays to assess functional change. In LLhG, all predicted sites are specificity determinants, as well as three sites not predicted by any algorithm. Strategies are suggested for diminishing the number of false negative predictions. Finally, individual substitutions at LLhG specificity determinants exhibited a broad range of functional changes that are not predicted by bioinformatics algorithms. Results suggest that some variants have altered affinity for DNA, some have altered allosteric response, and some appear to have changed specificity for alternative DNA ligands.
在蛋白质家族中,保守残基通常对共同的一般功能有贡献,例如DNA结合。然而,每个同源物的独特属性(例如对替代DNA序列的识别)必定源于其他功能重要位置的变异。这些“特异性决定因素”位置隐藏在对结构或功能均无显著贡献的多样残基背景之中。为了分离特异性决定因素,已开发出多种生物信息学算法。当应用于转录调节因子的LacI/GalR家族时,在连接DNA结合域和调节域的18个氨基酸中预测到了几个特异性决定因素。然而,其他算法的结果彼此仅部分一致。在此,我们使用一种由LacI DNA结合域、LacI连接子和GalR调节域组成的工程化阻遏物(LLhG)对这些预测进行实验评估。与LacI或类似的LacI:PurR嵌合体相比,“野生型”LLhG具有改变的DNA特异性和较弱的lacO(1)抑制作用。接下来,通过氨基酸替换和体内抑制试验来测试连接子特异性决定因素的预测,以评估功能变化。在LLhG中,所有预测位点都是特异性决定因素,还有三个位点未被任何算法预测到。文中提出了减少假阴性预测数量的策略。最后,LLhG特异性决定因素处的单个替换表现出广泛的功能变化,这些变化是生物信息学算法无法预测的。结果表明,一些变体对DNA的亲和力发生了改变,一些变体的变构反应发生了改变,还有一些似乎对替代DNA配体的特异性发生了改变。