Suppr超能文献

门静脉血栓形成的诊断:彩色多普勒成像的价值

Diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis: value of color Doppler imaging.

作者信息

Tessler F N, Gehring B J, Gomes A S, Perrella R R, Ragavendra N, Busuttil R W, Grant E G

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-6904.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Aug;157(2):293-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.2.1853809.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of color Doppler imaging in the diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis. Two hundred fifteen patients were studied with color Doppler imaging to determine patency of the main portal vein. Sonographic findings were confirmed in 75 patients, aged 19 to 66 years. Correlation with angiography was obtained in 13 patients, and surgical correlation was obtained in the remaining 62. Nine patients had portal vein thrombosis on the basis of these gold standards. Sonograms were classified as showing either patency or thrombosis, depending on the ability to show color flow within the main portal vein. Agreement between sonography and angiography or surgery was found in 69 patients (61 patent, eight thrombosed). One patient with a patent portal vein at sonography was found to have a thrombosed vessel at surgery, whereas five patients without portal venous flow at sonography had patent vessels at angiography (one patient) or surgery (four patients). Overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of portal vein thrombosis were 89% and 92%, with an accuracy of 92%, a false-negative rate of 0.11, a negative predictive value of 0.98, and a positive predictive value of 0.62. We postulate that the majority of errors in our study occurred in vessels that, although patent, had only sluggish flow, which could not be resolved because of technical limitations. We conclude that color Doppler imaging is a valuable screening procedure for the assessment of portal vein patency. If the sonogram shows a patent portal vein, no further studies are required. However, a lack of demonstrable flow does not always indicate thrombosis, and other imaging studies should be performed for confirmation.

摘要

本研究旨在确定彩色多普勒成像在门静脉血栓形成诊断中的准确性。对215例患者进行彩色多普勒成像检查,以确定门静脉主干的通畅情况。对75例年龄在19至66岁之间的患者的超声检查结果进行了确认。13例患者获得了与血管造影的相关性,其余62例获得了与手术的相关性。基于这些金标准,9例患者存在门静脉血栓形成。根据在门静脉主干内显示血流的能力,超声检查结果分为通畅或血栓形成。在69例患者(61例通畅,8例血栓形成)中发现超声检查与血管造影或手术结果一致。1例超声检查显示门静脉通畅的患者在手术中发现血管有血栓形成,而5例超声检查无门静脉血流的患者在血管造影(1例患者)或手术(4例患者)中发现血管通畅。检测门静脉血栓形成的总体敏感性和特异性分别为89%和92%,准确性为92%,假阴性率为0.11,阴性预测值为0.98,阳性预测值为0.62。我们推测,本研究中的大多数错误发生在那些虽然通畅但血流缓慢的血管中,由于技术限制无法分辨。我们得出结论,彩色多普勒成像对于评估门静脉通畅情况是一种有价值的筛查方法。如果超声检查显示门静脉通畅,则无需进一步检查。然而,未能显示血流并不总是表明存在血栓形成,应进行其他影像学检查以确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验