Posner Marshall, Vermorken Jan B
Head and Neck Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Semin Oncol. 2008 Jun;35(3):221-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.03.007.
As therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) has evolved, treatment has become increasingly aggressive and cure rates have risen. However, survival still remains poor. The evolving standard of care has focused on the concurrent use of chemotherapy with more aggressive radiotherapy; however, patients continue to recur locally and/or regionally, albeit at a diminished rate, and distant metastases have become a major site of fatal recurrence, while long-term local and acute systemic toxicities have increased. As a result of these changes in outcomes and a re-evaluation of earlier historical data by meta-analyses, interest in cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) induction chemotherapy has re-emerged and evolved. Most recently randomized studies comparing PF with PF plus a taxane, in particular docetaxel (TPF regimen), have demonstrated markedly superior survival with the three-drug regimens. TPF is now considered the standard of care for induction chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy, known as sequential therapy, has been shown to be safe and effective. This approach is promising and may have a survival advantage over chemoradiotherapy alone. Both TPF induction and sequential therapy are considered appropriate platforms upon which the new molecularly targeted agents can be tested.
随着局部晚期头颈癌(HNC)治疗方法的不断发展,治疗手段日益激进,治愈率也有所提高。然而,生存率仍然很低。不断发展的护理标准侧重于化疗与更激进的放疗同时使用;然而,患者仍会局部和/或区域复发,尽管复发率有所降低,远处转移已成为致命复发的主要部位,而长期局部和急性全身毒性却增加了。由于这些结果的变化以及通过荟萃分析对早期历史数据的重新评估,对顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)诱导化疗的兴趣再度兴起并不断发展。最近比较PF与PF加紫杉烷,特别是多西他赛(TPF方案)的随机研究表明,三联药物方案的生存率明显更高。TPF现在被认为是诱导化疗的护理标准。诱导化疗后进行放化疗,即序贯疗法,已被证明是安全有效的。这种方法很有前景,可能比单纯放化疗具有生存优势。TPF诱导和序贯疗法都被认为是测试新分子靶向药物的合适平台。