• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经自然腔道子宫切除术

Natural orifice hysterectomy.

作者信息

Moen Michael D, Noone Michael B, Elser Denise M

机构信息

Illinois Urogynecology Ltd., 1875 Dempster St., Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1189-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y. Epub 2008 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y
PMID:18545864
Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) such as natural orifice surgery is perceived as a relatively recent development partly because many MIS techniques utilize new technology and devices. However, a natural orifice/MIS approach for hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy, VH) has existed for over a century. VH is typically thought of in the realm of the urogynecologist as a component of reconstructive pelvic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. However, current evidence supports the use of VH in women with other benign conditions such as uterine fibroids and abnormal bleeding. Despite the evidence and availability of several MIS options for hysterectomy, the majority of hysterectomies continue to be performed via laparotomy. VH is the least invasive approach to hysterectomy, and its use should be encouraged as the preferred MIS option for women requiring uterine removal for benign conditions.

摘要

诸如经自然腔道手术等微创手术(MIS)被视为一项相对较新的进展,部分原因在于许多MIS技术采用了新技术和设备。然而,用于子宫切除术的经自然腔道/MIS方法(阴道子宫切除术,VH)已经存在了一个多世纪。在泌尿妇科领域,VH通常被视为盆腔器官脱垂重建性盆腔手术的一个组成部分。然而,目前的证据支持在患有其他良性疾病(如子宫肌瘤和异常出血)的女性中使用VH。尽管有证据表明有几种用于子宫切除术的MIS选择且这些选择也可获得,但大多数子宫切除术仍通过剖腹手术进行。VH是子宫切除术侵入性最小的方法,对于因良性疾病需要切除子宫的女性,应鼓励将其作为首选的MIS选择。

相似文献

1
Natural orifice hysterectomy.经自然腔道子宫切除术
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1189-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0659-y. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
2
Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: History and Recent Developments.阴道子宫切除术与盆腔器官脱垂:历史与最新进展。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jul;35(7):1363-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05783-7. Epub 2024 May 1.
3
Vaginal hysterectomy: the original minimally invasive surgery.阴道子宫切除术:最初的微创手术。
Minerva Ginecol. 2014 Feb;66(1):23-33.
4
A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.一项基于瑞典人群的良性子宫切除术评估,比较微创和开腹手术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Mar;222:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
5
Optimizing vaginal hysterectomy in women with large volume non-prolapse uteri: a novel minimally-invasive "aneurysm needle clampless technique".优化大体积非脱垂子宫女性的阴道子宫切除术:一种新型微创“动脉瘤针无钳夹技术”
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.04.045. Epub 2014 May 15.
6
Vaginal Access Minimally Invasive Surgery (VAMIS): A New Approach to Hysterectomy.阴道入路微创手术(VAMIS):子宫切除术的一种新方法。
Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):344-7. doi: 10.1177/1553350614560273. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
7
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.良性指征的微创子宫切除术:最新进展
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Jun;69(3):295-303. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04017-5. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
10
Is V-NOTES Hysterectomy as Safe and Feasible as Outpatient Surgery Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomy?与经阴道子宫切除术相比,单孔腹腔镜经阴道子宫切除术作为门诊手术是否同样安全可行?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 May;29(5):665-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Sexual Function After Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术后盆腔器官脱垂及性功能的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2590. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082590.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications.针对良性指征,经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术与经阴道子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 May 10;4(2):100355. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100355. eCollection 2024 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.2003年美国子宫切除术的发生率
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.无可见瘢痕的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:经阴道与经脐联合入路
Endoscopy. 2007 Oct;39(10):913-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966911.
3
Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital.大学教学医院进行的腹部、阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除术的观察性比较。
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic hysterectomy.
阴道自然腔道内镜手术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 8;4(1):100320. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100320. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 7;9(12):3959. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123959.
5
Hysterectomy and ovarian cystectomy using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: An initial experience at Tzu Chi General Hospital.采用自然腔道内镜手术进行子宫切除术和卵巢囊肿切除术:慈济总医院的初步经验。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):208-212. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_127_17.
J Reprod Med. 2006 Dec;51(12):945-54.
4
Hysterectomy rates for benign indications.良性指征的子宫切除率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1278-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000210640.86628.ff.
5
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3.
6
Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.可弯曲经胃腹膜镜检查:一种用于腹腔诊断和治疗干预的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):114-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01309-4.
7
Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术与标准子宫切除术的成本效益分析:一项随机试验的结果
BMJ. 2004 Jan 17;328(7432):134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37942.601331.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 7.
8
Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997.1990 - 1997年美国子宫切除术的比率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01723-9.
9
Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的前瞻性随机临床试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):955-62. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70667-8.
10
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 1):270-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70199-7.