Suppr超能文献

“慢性偏头痛”患者何时应被视为对药物预防性治疗“难治”?

When should "chronic migraine" patients be considered "refractory" to pharmacological prophylaxis?

作者信息

D'Amico Domenico, Leone Massimo, Grazzi Licia, Bussone Gennaro

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, C. Besta Neurological Institute, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2008 May;29 Suppl 1:S55-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-008-0888-3.

Abstract

Patients with chronic headache forms evolving from a previous episodic migraine ('chronic migraine') are often difficult to treat. In this paper we focus attention on aspects we believe important for producing a definition of "refractory" in relation to this headache form. We propose a "chronic migraine" patient should be considered "refractory" to pharmacological prophylaxis when adequate trials of preventive therapies at adequate doses have failed to reduce headache frequency and improve headache-related disability and, in patients with medication overuse, reduce the consumption of symptomatic drugs. However before a definition of "refractory" chronic migraine can become established, generally accepted diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines for this condition need to be developed.

摘要

由先前发作性偏头痛演变而来的慢性头痛形式(“慢性偏头痛”)患者通常难以治疗。在本文中,我们将注意力集中在我们认为对于针对这种头痛形式给出“难治性”定义很重要的方面。我们提议,当以适当剂量进行的预防性治疗充分试验未能降低头痛频率、改善与头痛相关的残疾,并且对于药物过度使用的患者未能减少对症药物的消耗量时,“慢性偏头痛”患者应被视为对药物预防“难治”。然而,在“难治性”慢性偏头痛的定义确立之前,需要制定针对这种病症的普遍接受的诊断标准和治疗指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验