• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[需治疗人数:评估治疗效果的有用工具]

[Number needed to treat: a useful tool for estimating the effectiveness of a treatment].

作者信息

van Harten P N

机构信息

Symfora Groep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(6):337-43.

PMID:18548411
Abstract

The concepts developed in evidence-based medicine, together with clinical experience, are the major principles on which clinical decisions are made. One of the concepts is number needed to treat (NNT), which means the number of patients who have to be treated either to prevent one additional unfavourable outcome or to achieve one additional favourable outcome. The NNT is dependent on the baseline risk (the risk of occurrence at baseline): the higher the baseline risk, the lower will be the NNT (which is more favourable). In contrast, the relative risk reduction is fairly independent of the baseline risk. NNT and number needed to harm provide numerical arguments for deciding whether a particular treatment does more good than harm.

摘要

循证医学中提出的概念,连同临床经验,是做出临床决策的主要原则。其中一个概念是需治疗人数(NNT),即必须接受治疗以预防一个额外不良结局或实现一个额外良好结局的患者数量。NNT取决于基线风险(基线时发生的风险):基线风险越高,NNT越低(这更有利)。相比之下,相对风险降低率相当独立于基线风险。NNT和伤害需治人数为决定某种特定治疗的利弊提供了数值依据。

相似文献

1
[Number needed to treat: a useful tool for estimating the effectiveness of a treatment].[需治疗人数:评估治疗效果的有用工具]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(6):337-43.
2
Evidence-based dermatology: number needed to treat and its relation to other risk measures.循证皮肤病学:治疗所需人数及其与其他风险指标的关系。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
3
[The history of evidence-based psychiatry and evidence-based guideline development].[循证精神病学与循证指南制定的历史]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(6):317-22.
4
The number needed to harm: is it too optimistic?伤害所需人数:这是否过于乐观?
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Dec;19(13):1490-2.
5
[Do guidelines lead to better clinical practice?].[指南能带来更好的临床实践吗?]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(6):323-8.
6
[NNT--numbers needed to treat].[需治疗人数——NNT]
Harefuah. 2003 Jul;142(7):541-3, 565.
7
Number needed to treat and number needed to harm are not the best way to report and assess the results of randomised clinical trials.需治疗人数和需伤害人数并非报告和评估随机临床试验结果的最佳方式。
Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;146(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07707.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
8
Relative risk, absolute risk and number needed to treat: basic concepts.相对风险、绝对风险和需治疗人数:基本概念
Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Jan;28(1):83-7.
9
[Using "number needed to treat" to interpret treatment effect].[使用“需治疗人数”来解释治疗效果]
Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2006 Jun;15(2):120-6.
10
Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.在慢性病治疗所需人数的计算中,发现年化率比绝对风险降低率更优。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Oct 13.