Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗的随机对照试验——晚期癌症患者及其亲属观点的调查

Randomised controlled trials of palliative care - a survey of the views of advanced cancer patients and their relatives.

作者信息

White Clare D, Hardy Janet R, Gilshenan Kristen S, Charles Margaret A, Pinkerton C Ross

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2008 Sep;44(13):1820-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if patients with advanced cancer are interested in participation in palliative care research, particularly RCTs, and the importance of demographic factors in decision making. It sought relatives' views towards supporting trial entry, and assessed if demographic factors can predict participation.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed through multiprofessional focus groups, patient and relative interviews and pilot studies. Consecutive patients known by the palliative care service to have advanced disease were approached. Relatives of consenting patients completed a parallel survey. K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate between those willing and unwilling to participate. Multivariate logistic regression identified demographic factors predicting willingness.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients and 100 relatives were included. 92% of patients would participate in studies involving simple interventions, whereas only 26% would consider studies of complex interventions. A similar pattern was observed for relative support. Over 75% of participants expressed altruistic views. Concepts of 'randomisation', 'placebo-control' and 'blinding' deterred about one-half. Many were prepared to complete short questionnaires, accept extra medications, investigations, hospital visits or admissions within a trial context but the possibility of side-effects was a major deterrent. Patient age was the only significant predictor of willingness to participate, with older patients less likely to participate.

CONCLUSION

Despite the likely absence of individual benefit, many patients appear willing to participate in palliative care research. Trial design and the possibility of side-effects proved very influential in their decision making. Clinical trials in palliative care are more likely to be successful if developed in accordance with the views of patients and their relatives.

摘要

目的

确定晚期癌症患者是否有兴趣参与姑息治疗研究,尤其是随机对照试验,以及人口统计学因素在决策中的重要性。研究还探寻了亲属对于支持患者参与试验的看法,并评估人口统计学因素能否预测参与情况。

方法

通过多专业焦点小组、患者及亲属访谈以及预试验设计了一份问卷。对姑息治疗服务机构已知的患有晚期疾病的连续患者进行调查。同意参与的患者的亲属完成一份平行调查问卷。采用K均值聚类分析来区分愿意和不愿意参与的人群。多变量逻辑回归分析确定了预测意愿的人口统计学因素。

结果

纳入了101名患者和100名亲属。92%的患者愿意参与涉及简单干预措施的研究,而只有26%的患者会考虑参与复杂干预措施的研究。亲属支持方面也观察到类似模式。超过75%的参与者表达了利他观点。“随机分组”“安慰剂对照”和“盲法”等概念使约一半的人望而却步。许多人准备好在试验背景下完成简短问卷、接受额外药物、检查、医院就诊或住院,但副作用的可能性是一个主要阻碍因素。患者年龄是参与意愿的唯一显著预测因素,老年患者参与的可能性较小。

结论

尽管可能没有个人益处,但许多患者似乎愿意参与姑息治疗研究。试验设计和副作用的可能性在他们的决策中被证明具有很大影响力。如果根据患者及其亲属的意见开展,姑息治疗中的临床试验更有可能成功。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验