Katula Jeffrey A, Rejeski W Jack, Marsh Anthony P
Department of Health & Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jun 13;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-45.
Although progressive resistance strength training (ST) has been found to improve various measures of physical functioning in older adults, the benefit to quality of life is unclear. Additionally, recent evidence suggests that high velocity power training (PT) may be more beneficial for physical functioning than ST, but it is not known whether this type of training impacts quality of life. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in multiple measures of quality of life resulting from ST vs. PT in older adults. A no exercise group was also included as control comparison condition.
Forty-five older adults (M age = 74.8 years; SD = 5.7) were randomly assigned to either a) PT, b) ST, or c) control group (no exercise). Measures of self-efficacy (SE), satisfaction with physical function (SPF), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL) were assessed at baseline and following training. The resistance training conditions met 3 times per week for 12 weeks at an intensity of 70% 1 repetition maximum.
A series of ANCOVA's comparing between group differences in change and controlling for baseline values revealed significant group differences in all three measures: SE (F(2,31) = 9.77; p < .001); SPF (F(2,32) = 3.36; p = .047); SWL (F(2,31) = 4.76; p = .016). Follow up analyses indicated that the PT group reported significantly more change in SE, SPF, and SWL than the control group whereas the ST group reported greater change than the control group only in SE.
These pilot data indicate that high velocity power training may influence multiple levels of quality of life over and above the benefits gained through traditional strength training.
尽管已发现渐进性抗阻力量训练(ST)可改善老年人身体机能的各项指标,但对生活质量的益处尚不清楚。此外,近期证据表明,高速动力训练(PT)对身体机能可能比ST更有益,但尚不清楚这种训练类型是否会影响生活质量。本研究的目的是比较老年人进行ST与PT后生活质量多项指标的变化。还纳入了一个不运动组作为对照比较条件。
45名老年人(平均年龄 = 74.8岁;标准差 = 5.7)被随机分配到以下三组之一:a)PT组,b)ST组,或c)对照组(不运动)。在基线和训练后评估自我效能感(SE)、对身体功能的满意度(SPF)以及生活满意度量表(SWL)。抗阻训练组每周训练3次,共12周,强度为1次重复最大值的70%。
一系列协方差分析比较了组间变化差异并控制基线值,结果显示在所有三项指标上均存在显著的组间差异:SE(F(2,31) = 9.77;p <.001);SPF(F(2,32) = 3.36;p =.047);SWL(F(2,31) = 4.76;p =.016)。后续分析表明,PT组在SE、SPF和SWL方面的变化显著大于对照组,而ST组仅在SE方面的变化大于对照组。
这些初步数据表明,高速动力训练可能会影响生活质量的多个层面,其益处超过传统力量训练所带来的。