Weir Stephanie, O'Neill Anna
Intensive Care Unit, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK.
Nurs Crit Care. 2008 Jul-Aug;13(4):185-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00282.x.
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) will more often than not require sedative and analgesic drugs to enable them to tolerate the invasive procedures and therapies caused as a result of their underlying condition and/or necessary medical interventions.
This article reports a study exploring the perceptions and experiences of intensive care nurses using a sedation/agitation scoring (SAS) tool to assess and manage sedation and agitation amongst critically ill patients. The principle aims and objectives of this study were as follows: to explore nurse's everyday experiences using a sedation scoring tool; to explore and understand nurse's attitudes and beliefs of the various components of assessing and managing sedation among critically ill patients.
Using a descriptive qualitative approach, semistructured interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of eight ICU nurses within a district general hospital ICU. The interviews focused on nurses own experiences and perceptions of using a sedation scoring tool in clinical practice. Burnards 14-stage thematic content analysis framework was employed to assist in the data analysis process.
Three key themes emerged that may have implications not only for clinical practice but for further research into the use of the SAS tool. Benefits to patient care as a direct result of using a sedation scoring tool. The concerns of nursing staff. The implications of using such a tool in clinical practice.
This paper reinforces the potential benefits to patients as a direct result of implementing the SAS scoring tool and clinical guidelines. Furthermore, it highlights the reluctance of a number of staff to adhere to such guidelines and discusses the concerns regarding less experienced nurses administering sedative agents. Attention was also drawn to the educational requirements of nursing and medical staff when using the SAS scoring tool.
入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者通常需要使用镇静和镇痛药物,以便他们能够耐受因基础疾病和/或必要的医疗干预而导致的侵入性操作和治疗。
本文报告了一项研究,该研究探讨了重症监护护士使用镇静/躁动评分(SAS)工具评估和管理重症患者镇静和躁动的认知与体验。本研究的主要目的和目标如下:探讨护士使用镇静评分工具的日常体验;探讨并了解护士对评估和管理重症患者镇静各个组成部分的态度和信念。
采用描述性定性研究方法,对一家地区综合医院ICU的8名ICU护士进行了有目的抽样的半结构式访谈。访谈聚焦于护士在临床实践中使用镇静评分工具的自身经历和认知。采用伯纳兹14阶段主题内容分析框架协助进行数据分析。
出现了三个关键主题,这些主题不仅可能对临床实践有影响,而且对SAS工具的使用进一步研究也有影响。使用镇静评分工具对患者护理的直接益处。护理人员的担忧。在临床实践中使用此类工具的影响。
本文强化了实施SAS评分工具和临床指南给患者带来的潜在益处。此外,它突出了一些工作人员不愿遵守此类指南的情况,并讨论了对经验不足的护士使用镇静剂的担忧。还提请注意护理和医务人员在使用SAS评分工具时的教育要求。