Han Sanghoon, Huettel Scott A, Dobbins Ian G
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 May;21(5):922-37. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21060.
Although lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) is clearly involved in decision-making, competing functional characterizations exist. One characterization posits that activation reflects the need to select among competing representations. In contrast, recent fMRI research suggests that activation is driven by the criterial classification of representations, even with minimal competition. To adjudicate between these hypotheses, we used event-related fMRI and contrasted tasks that required different numbers of criterial classifications prior to response in both perceptual and memory domains. Additionally, we manipulated the level of interstimulus competition by increasing the number of probes. Experiment 1 demonstrated that LPFC activation tracked the number of intermediate classifications during trials yet was insensitive to the number of competing probes and the behavioral decline accompanying competition. Furthermore, Experiment 2 demonstrated equivalent increases in LPFC activation for a task requiring two overt criterial classifications (independent classification) and one requiring two covert criterial classifications prior to the single overt response (same-different judgment). As found in Experiment 1, both tasks showed greater activation than a judgment requiring only one classification act (forced choice). These data indicate that LPFC responses reflect the number of executed criterial classifications or judgments, independent of the number of competing stimuli and the overt response demands of the decision task.
尽管外侧前额叶皮层(LPFC)明显参与决策,但存在相互竞争的功能特征描述。一种特征描述认为,激活反映了在相互竞争的表征之间进行选择的需求。相比之下,最近的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究表明,即使竞争最小,激活也是由表征的标准分类驱动的。为了在这些假设之间做出裁决,我们使用了事件相关功能磁共振成像,并对比了在感知和记忆领域中,在做出反应之前需要不同数量标准分类的任务。此外,我们通过增加探测刺激的数量来操纵刺激间竞争的程度。实验1表明,在试验过程中,LPFC的激活跟踪了中间分类的数量,但对竞争探测刺激的数量以及伴随竞争出现的行为下降不敏感。此外,实验2表明,对于一项需要两个公开标准分类(独立分类)的任务和一项在单一公开反应之前需要两个隐蔽标准分类(异同判断)的任务,LPFC的激活增加程度相当。正如在实验1中所发现的,这两项任务的激活程度都比仅需要一个分类行为的判断(强制选择)更大。这些数据表明,LPFC的反应反映了已执行的标准分类或判断的数量,而与竞争刺激的数量以及决策任务的公开反应要求无关。