Cryder Cynthia E, Lerner Jennifer S, Gross James J, Dahl Ronald E
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):525-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02118.x.
Misery is not miserly: Sadness increases the amount of money that decision makers give up to acquire a commodity. The present research investigated when and why the misery-is-not-miserly effect occurs. Drawing on William James's concept of the material self, we tested a model specifying relationships among sadness, self-focus, and the amount of money that decision makers spend. Consistent with our Jamesian hypothesis, results demonstrated that the misery-is-not-miserly effect occurs only when self-focus is high. That is, self-focus moderates the effect of sadness on spending. Moreover, mediational analyses revealed that, at sufficiently high levels, self-focus mediates (explains) the relationship between sadness and spending. Because the study used real commodities and real money, the results hold implications for everyday decisions, as well as implications for the development of theory. For example, economic theories of spending may benefit from incorporating psychological theories -- specifically, theories of emotion and the self -- into their models.
悲伤会增加决策者为获取一种商品而放弃的金钱数量。本研究调查了“痛苦并不吝啬”效应何时以及为何会出现。借鉴威廉·詹姆斯的物质自我概念,我们测试了一个模型,该模型明确了悲伤、自我关注与决策者支出金额之间的关系。与我们基于詹姆斯理论的假设一致,结果表明,只有当自我关注程度较高时,“痛苦并不吝啬”效应才会出现。也就是说,自我关注调节了悲伤对支出的影响。此外,中介分析表明,在足够高的水平上,自我关注介导(解释)了悲伤与支出之间的关系。由于该研究使用了真实的商品和真实的金钱,这些结果对日常决策以及理论发展都具有启示意义。例如,消费的经济理论可能会从将心理学理论——特别是情绪和自我理论——纳入其模型中受益。