Frandsen F, Petersen J, Hansen H S, Nielsen J E
Odense Sygehus, klinisk fysiologisk afdeling og medicinsk kardiologisk afdeling B.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Jul 15;153(29):2069-71.
Automatic blood-pressure registration on a computerized ergometer cycle was compared with simultaneous manually registered blood-pressure employing a standard mercury sphygmomanometer during performance of maximal ergometer exercise testing on 50 consecutive patients. The difference in blood-pressure registered by the automatic and the manual methods, respectively, was, on an average +0.2 mmHg with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 20 mmHg. By means of linear regression analysis, a correlation coefficient of 0.97 (p less than 0.001) with an uncertainty of approximately 6% with automatic blood-pressure registration was found. Simultaneously, the uncertainty was independent of the degree of work performed. The apparatus was found to be of practical clinical use.
在50例连续患者进行最大运动试验期间,将计算机化测力计周期上的自动血压记录与使用标准汞血压计同时手动记录的血压进行了比较。自动和手动方法记录的血压差异平均为+0.2 mmHg,95%置信区间为±20 mmHg。通过线性回归分析,发现自动血压记录的相关系数为0.97(p<0.001),不确定性约为6%。同时,不确定性与所做工作量无关。该设备被发现具有实际临床用途。