Vandenbussche F, Vanbinst T, Vandemeulebroucke E, Goris N, Sailleau C, Zientara S, De Clercq K
Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Department of Virology, Groeselenberg 99, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium.
J Virol Methods. 2008 Sep;152(1-2):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
Real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) was used routinely for laboratory diagnosis during the 2006/2007 bluetongue virus (BTV) serotype 8 epidemic. In the present study the impact of pooling and multiplexing strategies on RT-qPCR are assessed. To avoid any bias in the pooling experiments, 121 BTV-8 positive blood samples with a low to high viral load were selected and pooled individually with nine negative blood samples. Analyses of the individually and pooled samples indicated an overall mean difference of 4.32 Ct-values. The most pronounced differences were observed in samples with the lowest viral load of which 70% could no longer be detected after pooling. The pooling strategy is therefore not suitable for BTV detection at the individual level since animals infected recently may be missed. An alternative approach to reduce costs and workload is to apply a multiplexing strategy in which the viral RNA and internal beta-actin control RNA are detected in a single reaction. Parallel analysis (singleplex versus multiplex) of a 10-fold dilution series and 546 field samples proved that the sensitivity of the BTV RT-qPCR was not affected whereas the beta-actin reaction was reduced only slightly. Without the use of an internal control, 0.6% of 1985 field samples is at risk of being diagnosed incorrectly as negative.
在2006/2007年蓝舌病毒8型疫情期间,实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)被常规用于实验室诊断。在本研究中,评估了混合和多重策略对RT-qPCR的影响。为避免混合实验中的任何偏差,选择了121份病毒载量从低到高的蓝舌病毒8型阳性血样,并分别与9份阴性血样混合。对单独样本和混合样本的分析表明,总体平均差异为4.32个Ct值。在病毒载量最低的样本中观察到最明显的差异,其中70%的样本在混合后无法再被检测到。因此,混合策略不适用于个体水平的蓝舌病毒检测,因为最近感染的动物可能会被漏检。一种降低成本和工作量的替代方法是应用多重策略,即在单一反应中检测病毒RNA和内部β-肌动蛋白对照RNA。对10倍稀释系列和546份现场样本的平行分析(单重与多重)证明,蓝舌病毒RT-qPCR的灵敏度不受影响,而β-肌动蛋白反应仅略有降低。在不使用内部对照的情况下,1985份现场样本中有0.6%有被错误诊断为阴性的风险。