Lannon Carole M, Flower Kori, Duncan Paula, Moore Karen Strazza, Stuart Jayne, Bassewitz Jane
Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Center for Health Care Quality, 201 Silver Cedar Ct, Suite A, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e163-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2700.
The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of implementing a bundle of strategies to facilitate the use of Bright Futures recommendations and to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified learning collaborative in improving preventive and developmental care.
Fifteen pediatric primary care practices from 9 states participated in a 9-month learning collaborative. Support to practices included a toolkit, 2 workshops, training in quality-improvement methods, monthly conference calls and data feedback, and a listserv moderated by faculty. Aggregated medical chart reviews and practice self-assessments on 6 key office system components were compared before and after the intervention.
Office system changes most frequently adopted were use of recall/reminder systems (87%), a checklist to link to community resources (80%), and systematic identification of children with special health care needs (80%). From baseline to follow-up, increases were observed in the use of recall/reminder systems, the proportion of children's charts that had a preventive services prompting system, and the families who were asked about special health care needs. Of 21 possible office system components, the median number used increased from 10 to 15. Comparing scores between baseline and follow-up for each practice site, the change was significant. Teams reported that the implementation of office systems was facilitated by the perception that a component could be applied quickly and/or easily. Barriers to implementation included costs, the time required, and lack of agreement with the recommendations.
This project demonstrated the feasibility of implementing specific strategies for improving preventive and developmental care for young children in a wide variety of practices. It also confirmed the usefulness of a modified learning collaborative in achieving these results. This model may be useful for disseminating office system improvements to other settings that provide care for young children.
本研究的目的是评估实施一系列策略以促进使用“光明未来”建议的可行性,并评估改良的学习协作在改善预防和发育保健方面的有效性。
来自9个州的15家儿科初级保健机构参与了为期9个月的学习协作。对各机构的支持包括一个工具包、两次研讨会、质量改进方法培训、每月电话会议和数据反馈,以及由教员主持的在线讨论组。在干预前后,对6个关键办公系统组件进行了综合病历审查和机构自我评估,并进行了比较。
最常采用的办公系统变化包括使用召回/提醒系统(87%)、链接社区资源的检查表(80%)以及对有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的系统识别(80%)。从基线到随访,召回/提醒系统的使用、有预防服务提示系统的儿童病历比例以及被询问特殊医疗保健需求的家庭数量均有所增加。在21个可能的办公系统组件中,使用的中位数从10个增加到了15个。比较每个实践地点基线和随访之间的分数,变化显著。各团队报告称,认为某个组件可以快速和/或轻松应用有助于办公系统的实施。实施的障碍包括成本、所需时间以及对建议的不认同。
该项目证明了在各种医疗机构中实施改善幼儿预防和发育保健的具体策略的可行性。它还证实了改良的学习协作在实现这些成果方面的有用性。这种模式可能有助于将办公系统改进推广到其他为幼儿提供护理的机构。