Suppr超能文献

实施发育筛查和转介:国家项目的经验教训。

Implementing developmental screening and referrals: lessons learned from a national project.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 200 N Wolfe St, Room 2072, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):350-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0388. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the degree to which a national sample of pediatric practices could implement American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations for developmental screening and referrals, and to identify factors that contributed to the successes and shortcomings of these efforts.

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the AAP released a policy statement on developmental surveillance and screening that included an algorithm to aid practices in implementation. Simultaneously, the AAP launched a 9-month pilot project in which 17 diverse practices sought to implement the policy statement's recommendations.

METHODS

Quantitative data from chart reviews were used to calculate rates of screening and referral. Qualitative data on practices' implementation efforts were collected through semistructured telephone interviews and inductively analyzed to generate key themes.

RESULTS

Nearly all practices selected parent-completed screening instruments. Instrument selection was frequently driven by concerns regarding clinic flow. At the project's conclusion, practices reported screening more than 85% of patients presenting at recommended screening ages. They achieved this by dividing responsibilities among staff and actively monitoring implementation. Despite these efforts, many practices struggled during busy periods and times of staff turnover. Most practices were unable or unwilling to adhere to 3 specific AAP recommendations: to implement a 30-month visit; to administer a screen after surveillance suggested concern; and to submit simultaneous referrals both to medical subspecialists and local early-intervention programs. Overall, practices reported referring only 61% of children with failed screens. Many practices also struggled to track their referrals. Those that did found that many families did not follow through with recommended referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

A diverse sample of practices successfully implemented developmental screening as recommended by the AAP. Practices were less successful in placing referrals and tracking those referrals. More attention needs to be paid to the referral process, and many practices may require separate implementation systems for screening and referrals.

摘要

目的

评估全国儿科实践样本实施美国儿科学会(AAP)发育筛查和转介建议的程度,并确定促成这些努力成功和不足的因素。

背景

2006 年,AAP 发布了一项关于发育监测和筛查的政策声明,其中包括一个帮助实践实施的算法。与此同时,AAP 启动了一个为期 9 个月的试点项目,其中 17 家不同的实践机构试图实施该政策声明的建议。

方法

使用图表审查的定量数据来计算筛查和转介的比率。通过半结构化电话访谈收集关于实践实施工作的定性数据,并进行归纳分析以生成关键主题。

结果

几乎所有实践都选择了家长完成的筛查工具。工具选择通常受到对诊所流程的关注驱动。在项目结束时,实践报告称在推荐的筛查年龄对超过 85%的患者进行了筛查。他们通过在员工之间分配责任并积极监测实施来实现这一目标。尽管做出了这些努力,但许多实践在繁忙时期和员工更替期间仍面临困难。大多数实践无法或不愿意遵守 AAP 的 3 项具体建议:实施 30 个月的就诊;在监测显示关注后进行筛查;并同时向医学专家和当地早期干预计划转介。总体而言,实践报告仅将 61%筛查失败的儿童转介。许多实践也难以跟踪他们的转介。那些进行跟踪的实践发现,许多家庭没有遵循推荐的转介。

结论

一个多样化的实践样本成功地按照 AAP 的建议实施了发育筛查。实践在放置转介和跟踪这些转介方面的效果较差。需要更多地关注转介过程,许多实践可能需要为筛查和转介分别建立实施系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验