Brown Joshua W, Hanes Doug P, Schall Jeffrey D, Stuphorn Veit
Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(2):135-51. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1455-0. Epub 2008 Jul 5.
The countermanding (or stop signal) task probes the control of the initiation of a movement by measuring subjects' ability to withhold a movement in various degrees of preparation in response to an infrequent stop signal. Previous research found that saccades are initiated when the activity of movement-related neurons reaches a threshold, and saccades are withheld if the growth of activity is interrupted. To extend and evaluate this relationship of frontal eye field (FEF) activity to saccade initiation, two new analyses were performed. First, we fit a neurometric function that describes the proportion of trials with a stop signal in which neural activity exceeded a criterion discharge rate as a function of stop signal delay, to the inhibition function that describes the probability of producing a saccade as a function of stop signal delay. The activity of movement-related but not visual neurons provided the best correspondence between neurometric and inhibition functions. Second, we determined the criterion discharge rate that optimally discriminated between the distributions of discharge rates measured on trials when saccades were produced or withheld. Differential activity of movement-related but not visual neurons could distinguish whether a saccade occurred. The threshold discharge rates determined for individual neurons through these two methods agreed. To investigate how reliably movement-related activity predicted movement initiation; the analyses were carried out with samples of activity from increasing numbers of trials from the same or from different neurons. The reliability of both measures of initiation threshold improved with number of trials and neurons to an asymptote of between 10 and 20 movement-related neurons. Combining the activity of visual neurons did not improve the reliability of predicting saccade initiation. These results demonstrate how the activity of a population of movement-related but not visual neurons in the FEF contributes to the control of saccade initiation. The results also validate these analytical procedures for identifying signals that control saccade initiation in other brain structures.
反指令(或停止信号)任务通过测量受试者在不同准备程度下响应不频繁的停止信号而抑制运动的能力,来探究对运动起始的控制。先前的研究发现,当与运动相关的神经元活动达到阈值时,扫视运动就会启动,如果活动的增长被中断,扫视运动就会被抑制。为了扩展和评估额叶眼区(FEF)活动与扫视运动起始之间的这种关系,我们进行了两项新的分析。首先,我们将一个神经测量函数拟合到抑制函数上,该神经测量函数描述了带有停止信号的试验中神经活动超过标准放电率的试验比例作为停止信号延迟的函数,而抑制函数描述了产生扫视运动的概率作为停止信号延迟的函数。与运动相关而非视觉的神经元活动在神经测量函数和抑制函数之间提供了最佳的对应关系。其次,我们确定了能最佳区分产生或抑制扫视运动的试验中测量的放电率分布的标准放电率。与运动相关而非视觉的神经元的差异活动可以区分是否发生了扫视运动。通过这两种方法为单个神经元确定的阈值放电率是一致的。为了研究与运动相关的活动对运动起始的预测有多可靠,我们使用来自相同或不同神经元的越来越多试验的活动样本进行了分析。起始阈值的两种测量方法的可靠性都随着试验次数和神经元数量的增加而提高,直到达到10到20个与运动相关的神经元之间的渐近线。结合视觉神经元的活动并没有提高预测扫视运动起始的可靠性。这些结果证明了FEF中与运动相关而非视觉的神经元群体的活动如何有助于控制扫视运动的起始。这些结果也验证了这些分析程序,用于识别控制其他脑结构中扫视运动起始的信号。