Suppr超能文献

对响应信号和响应时间数据进行建模。

Modeling response signal and response time data.

作者信息

Ratcliff Roger

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2006 Nov;53(3):195-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002. Epub 2006 Aug 4.

Abstract

The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) and the leaky competing accumulator model (LCA, Usher & McClelland, 2001) were tested against two-choice data collected from the same subjects with the standard response time procedure and the response signal procedure. In the response signal procedure, a stimulus is presented and then, at one of a number of experimenter-determined times, a signal to respond is presented. The models were fit to the data from the two procedures simultaneously under the assumption that responses in the response signal procedure were based on a mixture of decision processes that had already terminated at response boundaries before the signal and decision processes that had not yet terminated. In the latter case, decisions were based on partial information in one variant of each model or on guessing in a second variant. Both variants of the diffusion model fit the data well and both fit better than either variant of the LCA model, although the differences in numerical goodness-of-fit measures were not large enough to allow decisive selection between the models.

摘要

扩散模型(拉特克利夫,1978年)和泄漏竞争累加器模型(LCA,厄舍和麦克莱兰,2001年)通过标准反应时程序和反应信号程序,针对从同一受试者收集的二选一数据进行了测试。在反应信号程序中,先呈现一个刺激,然后在实验者确定的多个时间点之一,呈现一个做出反应的信号。在假设反应信号程序中的反应基于信号出现前已在反应边界终止的决策过程和尚未终止的决策过程的混合的前提下,将这些模型同时拟合到来自这两种程序的数据上。在后一种情况下,决策在每个模型的一个变体中基于部分信息,或者在第二个变体中基于猜测。扩散模型的两个变体都能很好地拟合数据,并且都比LCA模型的任何一个变体拟合得更好,尽管数值拟合优度指标的差异不够大,无法在这些模型之间做出决定性的选择。

相似文献

1
Modeling response signal and response time data.
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Nov;53(3):195-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
2
Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.
Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):900-16. doi: 10.1037/a0013930.
4
A model of the go/no-go task.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):389-413. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389.
5
An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):3-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03194023.
6
A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Feb;26(1):127-40. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.127.
7
Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects.
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun;103:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1206-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03196847.

引用本文的文献

2
The forced-response method: A new chronometric approach to measure conflict processing.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):15. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02516-y.
3
Probing the origins of subjective confidence in source memory decisions in young and older adults: A sequential sampling account.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Mar;154(3):799-828. doi: 10.1037/xge0001680. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Latent mechanisms of language disorganization relate to specific dimensions of psychopathology.
Nat Ment Health. 2024;2(12):1486-1497. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00351-w. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
5
Performance enhancement of mid-infrared NH sensor using 9.06 μm QCL based on spectral optimization and NGO-LSTM model.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jan;417(3):653-662. doi: 10.1007/s00216-024-05677-z. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
6
Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model.
Brain Sci. 2024 Oct 4;14(10):1005. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14101005.
7
Bayesian confidence in optimal decisions.
Psychol Rev. 2024 Oct;131(5):1114-1160. doi: 10.1037/rev0000472. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
10
Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks.
J Math Psychol. 2023 Dec;117:102815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102815.

本文引用的文献

2
A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):145-66. doi: 10.3758/BF03209391.
3
List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Jan;4(1):16-30. doi: 10.3758/BF03213250.
4
Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.
Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):574-6. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4099.574.
5
A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task.
Psychol Aging. 2004 Jun;19(2):278-89. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278.
6
On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):261-82. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.261.
8
A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333.
9
A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
Cogn Psychol. 2004 May;48(3):332-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.08.001.
10
A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):159-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验