• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次婚前性行为时的避孕措施使用情况:美国,1965年至1988年。

Contraceptive use at first premarital intercourse: United States, 1965-1988.

作者信息

Mosher W D, McNally J W

机构信息

National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

出版信息

Fam Plann Perspect. 1991 May-Jun;23(3):108-16.

PMID:1860476
Abstract

The proportion of U.S. women who used a contraceptive method at their first premarital intercourse rose from 47 percent in 1975-1979 to 65 percent in 1983-1988. Overall, and among non-Hispanic white women, this change resulted entirely from an increase in the use of condoms by their partners. The proportion of whites who used a condom at first premarital intercourse, for example, increased from 24 percent to 45 percent. Among blacks, condom use at first intercourse increased from 24 percent to 32 percent during that period, and pill use rose from 15 percent to 23 percent. Among all women, the method most often used at first intercourse during every period in the study was the condom, followed by the pill and withdrawal. The proportion of women using a method at first premarital intercourse varies strikingly according to individual characteristics. Among the various demographic subgroups, the proportion who use a method varies from 32 percent of Hispanic women to 68 percent of Jewish women. Whites are more likely to use a method than are blacks, and fundamentalist Prostestants are less likely to use a method than are other Protestants or Catholics. The proportion using a method is higher among women whose mothers completed high school than among those whose mothers did not. In addition, the proportion rises with age at first intercourse. Multiple logistic regression showed that the independent effects of Hispanic origin, Jewish or fundamentalist Protestant religious affiliation and the education of a woman's mother are large and significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在首次婚前性行为时采取避孕措施的美国女性比例,从1975 - 1979年的47%升至1983 - 1988年的65%。总体而言,在非西班牙裔白人女性中,这一变化完全是由于其伴侣使用避孕套的增加所致。例如,在首次婚前性行为时使用避孕套的白人比例从24%增至45%。在此期间,黑人在首次性行为时使用避孕套的比例从24%增至32%,使用避孕药的比例从15%升至23%。在所有女性中,研究各阶段首次性行为时最常使用的方法是避孕套,其次是避孕药和体外射精。首次婚前性行为时采取避孕措施的女性比例因个人特征而有显著差异。在不同的人口亚组中,采取避孕措施的比例从西班牙裔女性的32%到犹太女性的68%不等。白人比黑人更有可能采取避孕措施,原教旨主义新教徒比其他新教徒或天主教徒采取避孕措施的可能性更小。母亲完成高中学业的女性采取避孕措施的比例高于母亲未完成高中学业的女性。此外,采取避孕措施的比例随首次性行为时的年龄增长而上升。多元逻辑回归显示,西班牙裔血统、犹太教或原教旨主义新教宗教信仰以及女性母亲的教育程度的独立影响很大且具有显著性。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
Contraceptive use at first premarital intercourse: United States, 1965-1988.首次婚前性行为时的避孕措施使用情况:美国,1965年至1988年。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1991 May-Jun;23(3):108-16.
2
First premarital contraceptive use: United States, 1960-82.首次婚前避孕措施的使用情况:美国,1960 - 1982年。
Stud Fam Plann. 1987 Mar-Apr;18(2):83-95.
3
Contraceptive use, pregnancy and fertility patterns among single American women in their 20s.20多岁美国单身女性的避孕措施使用情况、怀孕及生育模式。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jan-Feb;17(1):10-9.
4
Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002.美国避孕措施的使用及计划生育服务的利用情况:1982 - 2002年
Adv Data. 2004 Dec 10(350):1-36.
5
Contraceptive use in Canada, 1984.1984年加拿大的避孕措施使用情况
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):209-15.
6
The initiation of adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior during changing times.时代变迁中的青少年性与避孕行为初现
J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Mar;37(1):59-74.
7
The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse.初次性交时避孕措施使用的关系背景。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):104-10.
8
Abortion patients in 1994-1995: characteristics and contraceptive use.1994 - 1995年的堕胎患者:特征与避孕措施使用情况
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):140-7, 158.
9
Young women's degree of control over first intercourse: an exploratory analysis.年轻女性对初次性交的控制程度:一项探索性分析。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):12-8.
10
The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982-1988.1982 - 1988年美国女性的性与生殖行为
Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Sep-Oct;22(5):206-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing adolescent pregnancy: biological, social, cultural, and political influences on age at first sexual intercourse.预防青少年怀孕:首次性行为年龄的生物学、社会、文化及政治影响
J Prim Prev. 2014 Aug;35(4):239-54. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0344-5.
2
The smart life.智能生活。
J Prim Prev. 1996 Sep;17(1):175-200. doi: 10.1007/BF02262744.
3
Sexual timetables for oral-genital, vaginal, and anal intercourse: sociodemographic comparisons in a nationally representative sample of adolescents.青少年全国代表性样本中口交、阴道交和肛交的性时间表:社会人口统计学比较。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1221-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300394. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
4
Community Context, Land Use and First Birth.社区环境、土地利用与初育
Rural Sociol. 2010 Sep;75(3):478-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00019.x.
5
Sexual Debut Timing and Depressive Symptoms in Emerging Adulthood.成年初期的首次性行为时机与抑郁症状
J Youth Adolesc. 2008 Oct;37(9):1085-1096. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9303-x.
6
Age at first sexual intercourse, genes, and social context: evidence from twins and the dopamine D4 receptor gene.首次性行为的年龄、基因与社会环境:来自双胞胎及多巴胺D4受体基因的证据
Demography. 2006 Nov;43(4):747-69. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0029.
7
Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy among postpartum women in California.加利福尼亚州产后妇女意外怀孕方面的社会经济和种族/族裔差异。
Matern Child Health J. 2002 Dec;6(4):237-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1021158016268.
8
Risky parental behavior and adolescent sexual activity at first coitus.父母的危险行为与青少年首次性交时的性活动。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):481-524, iii-iv. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00020.
9
Effect of changes in human ecology and behavior on patterns of sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus infection.人类生态与行为变化对包括人类免疫缺陷病毒感染在内的性传播疾病模式的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2430-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2430.
10
Neighborhood context and residential mobility.邻里环境与居住流动性。
Demography. 1994 May;31(2):249-70.